Recent content by 00ber_m00

What are you doing that makes a 3mb connection too slow? And to answer your question, FIOS and cable can be faster.

Sorry, I missed that part. Does the traceroute run successfully on the computers that can reach the site? Also, are the computers that can reach the site on the same switch, router, and subnet as the computer that cannot access?

Is telenor your ISP? Because it looks like that's where the packet is getting dropped.

You didn't offer any negatives for moving to the new job or any positives for staying with your current job. There must be some if you can't make up your mind. If you would care to share those then you may get helpful responses. If there are none...well, essentially you just asked if you had...

That is exactly how you do it, yes. See, the no-ip software is really using the IP address associated with your router/modem not with any of your individual pc's. So when you remote desktop to company.myvnc.com you are really sending a remote desktop request to your router and then it forwards...

Someone already mentioned this idea but the best and easiest way to accomplish what you want (in my opinion) is to change the listening port on the computers. All of your computers listen on port 3389 for remote desktop. Let's say you have 5 computers. Leave the first one untouched. On the...

You can connect them in Ad-hoc mode. Look at the instructions for your particular wireless adapter to find out how but it's just as easy as connecting to a regular network.

No he is not. If you are using the full install CD to perform an upgrade you can do that as long as you have a full install CD key.

Have you called them and asked if there was a way to use itunes without your connection being throttled?

Unless you're running software on your own network that requires MAC authentication and are spoofing MAC addresses for that reason only (ie you aren't trying to fool anything outside your own network) I suppose it would be legit. Cable modem ISPs generally have MAC authentication enabled...

It's funny you make a comparison of IPv6 to global warming. Since it's well known that IPv4 addresses will run out (2012 seems to be a well accepted estimate) you must be acknowledging that global warming will also cause serious problems in the future. Welcome to the club my liberal friend. :D

I don't think we're on the same wavelength. Perhaps you missed the post I made immediately after the one you are quoting that explains my post is supposed to say IPv6 has much more than a larger set of IP addresses.

You are mistaken. The fellow you quoted made no implication that the larger IP address space had anything to do with the security enhancements. xphil3 was dead on with his post.

My previous post should have said that IPv6 is more than just a larger IP address space. But you haven't heard about IPv4 addresses being a problem yet because they won't run out until 2012 (current estimate by IANA and ICANN). And like I said. There is more to IPv6 than just more ip...

IPv6 has much more a larger set of IP addresses. The security benefits alone are tremendous.