Although rumors suggested $150 was the price for models in the U.S., EVGA’s first GTX 1630 is listed for $200. With GPU prices where they are now, you can purchase a brand-new RX 6500 XT for less money. And despite the fact that we called it one of the worst tech products of the year in our RX 6500 XT review, it’s still twice as fast as the GTX 1630.
https://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/nvidia-gtx-1630-smoked-six-year-old-amd-gpu/
https://www.pcgamer.com/this-is-the...com&utm_campaign=socialflow&utm_medium=social
The GTX 1650 Super was actually a great 1080p GPU when it launched, and would still deliver an effective 1080p gaming experience on a host of popular games. The new GTX 1630, by contrast, absolutely won't. Checking out TechPowerUp's review(opens in new tab) of the Gainward version and its average frame rates across its full suite of gaming benchmarks sees the GTX 1630 performing 54% slower than the GTX 1650 Super.
https://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/nvidia-gtx-1630-smoked-six-year-old-amd-gpu/
This is the saddest GPU launch in history and for once I'm not talking about the Intel Arc A380
You're telling me they couldn't make a GTX 1650 Super for $159 today?https://www.pcgamer.com/this-is-the...com&utm_campaign=socialflow&utm_medium=social
The GTX 1650 Super was actually a great 1080p GPU when it launched, and would still deliver an effective 1080p gaming experience on a host of popular games. The new GTX 1630, by contrast, absolutely won't. Checking out TechPowerUp's review(opens in new tab) of the Gainward version and its average frame rates across its full suite of gaming benchmarks sees the GTX 1630 performing 54% slower than the GTX 1650 Super.