NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Nerfs Not Only Ethereum Hash Rate But Also Other Coin Algorithms

are people still blaming the GPU shortage on miners? the miner bogyman thing is getting old... scalpers and supply shortages are the real issue, and the supply shortages won't be cleared up anytime soon, even if all crypto coins disappear tomorrow
 
On principle I vehemently reject this and hope that whatever "projections" are cracked ASAP. This does pretty much nothing for gamers for a wide variety of reasons, yet normalizes the idea that a $1200 TWELVE HUNDRED DOLLAR GPU can be intentionally crippled and everyone is just fine with that. Quadro or other professional cards and the like have their own problems at times when it comes to function, but this is in no way analogous to what's happening here - this is at least a step further and way more blatant. Hell, it took quite some time for a step in the other direction where users could select between gaming driver packages and developer/creator driver packages on the same consumer card . I don't want a future where a "gaming" card won't be able to encode or decode video, you'll need a video editing GPU for that, which is separate from a mining GPU, which is separate from a rendering GPU, a development GPU, Physics GPU etc... because of intentional limitations creating a wide variety of product lines.

The real issue here isn't "gamers vs miners" , its a shortage . Of course, that is being exploited by just about everyone from Nvidia to AIB to vendors online and off jacking prices to the moon , to a whole host of increasingly sophisticated scalpers. Eventually this situation is going to end and all the big stakeholders in the industry are just rubbing their hands together loving how that excuses for higher prices, less features , and more will all become normalized - so the next generation they can just cry poor and say "but we HAVE to continue those practices see we can't afford NOT to..." and everyone will shrug and move on with it. This whole thing is a mess - the 3080 Ti isn't even the 20GB RAM card we thought it might be, is minimum $1200 (much higher if AIB surely), and apparently certain versions of the cards are LHR-limited (and I'm not sure how well this is labeled on the box - there had better be LHR graphics on both the box and the card itself somehow lest we're going to get people trying to sell LHR cards as full-function cards !) yet others are not (I read that FE versions are NOT LHR, unsure if this is fully confirmed) and of course we'll have LHR versions of older product lines like baseline 3080 and 3070 going forward it seems.

All this serves to do is stop those who may own a card or two from getting the full measure of its value even if they choose to momentarily mine in order to help defer the crazy costs it takes to get a GPU even MSRP-based now.. Worse, its going to set the precedent I described above. Lest anyone say that well Nvidia "had" to do this , there was another path - a mirror of the one we saw with the 1660Ti . If they wanted to make a version of the card that didn't have the tensor cores and other hardware for their specific RTX / DLSS they could have done it - a cheaper version of each card without these features dedicated hardware which would also be less viable in mining for that reason - less expensive to manufacture, ideally sold cheaper as well, without intentionally putting a lock over existing hardware functionality. Its kind of like how AMD 6000 series GPUs game very well but don't, for their cost, mine as efficiently as the 5000 or Vega series did; AMD didn't go out of their way to gimp mining, they simply made different hardware decisions on the infinity fabric which had a much greater gaming benefit than it did mining, in terms of value. You can still mine on an AMD card without any artificial limitation! However, Nvidia would never do this sort of thing would they? Not since they decided they'd stake their crown in the gaming market this generation entirely on RT / DLSS , given that AMD has finally caught up performance wise on regular rasterized stuff even on the high end! So instead they focus on how at least temporarily they hold the RT / DLSS crown until the optimizations for AMD-style hardware raytracing comes in and AMD's Super Resolution would debut etc.

So NV's not taking the current path "for the gamers" with overpriced, hobble, GPUs they're just setting themselves up for a future where exploitation is the norm and they can claim any who object to it as behind the times. I'd say don't let them do so and spend your money instead on preferably AMD GPUs or at very least the unencumbered models of NV 3000 if you're able to find them at MSRP, but given the current situation people are going to clamber for anything and it will sell out ; I worry advising others not to purchase them will be looked back in the same way that I do when I advised people not to buy Obivion's Horse Armor or lootboxes/cosmetic item mall nonsense because I knew it would only get worse if they were successful
 
are people still blaming the GPU shortage on miners? the miner bogyman thing is getting old... scalpers and supply shortages are the real issue, and the supply shortages won't be cleared up anytime soon, even if all crypto coins disappear tomorrow
?

If the scalper are reselling them are they not having a nill impact on shortage ?

If people cannot mine on those new PS5 and XBOX and we cannot buy them at bestbuy yet, I would agree that we do not need much more explanation that the current gaming hardware demand is bigger than the supply and that the rest does not help, but can be minor (but maybe not).
 
Would or would not a miner be less likely to buy a card that is gimped at mining? Or are they going to buy it just for shits 'n' giggles?

One card not bought by a miner is a card that will be bought by a gamer.
Miners don't want to buy gimped cards this is true. But the real problem is scalpers buying out the cards and the miners are the ones who are willing to pay the higher price for them.
Scalpers are going to buy all the cards regardless gimped or not for resale to whomever guys them
 
Last edited:
are people still blaming the GPU shortage on miners? the miner bogyman thing is getting old... scalpers and supply shortages are the real issue, and the supply shortages won't be cleared up anytime soon, even if all crypto coins disappear tomorrow
The whole mining run up set the price floor for GPU value, the bots and scalpers are the ones benefitting from that price floor. A quick trip to Reddit ethereum mining sub will show that there are miners providing demand for GPUs beyond a simple gaming need, so there’s that. It’s a perfect storm. Normally the scalpers and bots rule early in the product launches, we saw that with Turing, but that usually subsides after a month or two and the people who fancy shiny stuff get their demand filled. But mining demand has kept the bots and scalpers in business for the last 6+ months.
We’ll know in two months if the EIP1559 will drastically effect used gpu prices or not. If gpu prices drop and continue to drop, then we’ll have proof that miners were the villain. If they drop a bit then miners start snatching up cheaper compute to mine other coins, then we’ll know that miners will continue to be the villains.

TLDR: fuck crypto
 
. If they wanted to make a version of the card that didn't have the tensor cores and other hardware for their specific RTX / DLSS they could have done it - a cheaper version of each card without these features dedicated hardware which would also be less viable in mining for that reason - less expensive to manufacture, ideally sold cheaper as well, without intentionally putting a lock over existing hardware functionality
Do mining use tensor-RTX hardware significantly ?

I know nothing so this is based on a quick google search but apparently oustide Raycoin it would not have done much, that integer alu from ethash is quite different from deep learning accelerated hardware.
 
Miners don't want to buy Kim's cards this is true. But the real problem is scalpers buying out the cards and the miners are the ones who are willing to pay the higher price for them.
Scalpers are going to buy all the cards regardless gift or not for resale

If I were a betting man, I would say that the governments of certain countries are buying as many of these cards as they possibly can. I won't speculate further than that, but it's impossible for enough average people to suddenly start scalping or mining to make that much of an impact. Most ordinary people outside of this hobby have no concept of such things.
 
Last edited:
Maybe I'm over


If I were a betting man, I would say that the governments of certain countries are buying as many of these cards as they possibly can. I won't speculate further than that, but it's impossible for enough average people to suddenly start scalping or mining to make that much of an impact. Most ordinary people outside of this hobby have no concept of such things.

That seem to leave company specialized in mining that exist everywhere where currents can be acquired on the cheaper side:

https://montrealgazette.com/business/magogs-the-latest-quebec-town-with-a-bitcoin-mining-moratorium
https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/mxc-pancakeswap-roll-joint-mining-193800945.html
https://fortune.com/2020/08/27/bitcoin-mining-dcg-foundry-north-america-btc/

During the first bubble, private demande from crypto went up for 40% of all hydro electricity of Quebec:
https://montrealgazette.com/news/lo...-charge-cryptocurrency-miners-increased-rates
 
Do mining use tensor-RTX hardware significantly ?

I know nothing so this is based on a quick google search but apparently oustide Raycoin it would not have done much, that integer alu from ethash is quite different from deep learning accelerated hardware.
It does not, Ethereum and basically, all the GPU-based coins are 32-bit calculations, so the tensor cores do absolutely nothing. I am sure NV is floating around the idea of CMP cards based on an evolved version of the 10 series on a new process with HBM2 memory. Those would be absolute beasts for GPU-based coins, the real question is how much longer coins are going to be GPU-based. But when Ethereum finally does transition off, I am sure another 3 coins will magically appear to take its place.
 
It does not, Ethereum and basically, all the GPU-based coins are 32-bit calculations, so the tensor cores do absolutely nothing. I am sure NV is floating around the idea of CMP cards based on an evolved version of the 10 series on a new process with HBM2 memory. Those would be absolute beasts for GPU-based coins, the real question is how much longer coins are going to be GPU-based. But when Ethereum finally does transition off, I am sure another 3 coins will magically appear to take its place.
Pump and dump. Rinse and repeat.
 
I saw this story get picked up by all the tech blogs, but from what I've seen this isn't true and a bunch of sites posted it without fact checking as usual. The video below shows Raven at 43 and Ergo at 220 which means they aren't limited.



My card arrives today so I guess I'll find out myself what the truth is.
 
Yep, and no mining on the side to recoup some of it. Be a good boy and buy the near warrantyless mining cards with no display output or resale value.
If you can't afford a gaming card buy a cheaper one, a gaming gpu is not an investment. Unless you actually use it for work, you know real work, not generating funny money in your basement.
 
I saw this story get picked up by all the tech blogs, but from what I've seen this isn't true and a bunch of sites posted it without fact checking as usual. The video below shows Raven at 43 and Ergo at 220 which means they aren't limited.



My card arrives today so I guess I'll find out myself what the truth is.

There are so many coins out there that it would be near impossible to filter them all without issuing frequent firmware updates, which isn't going to happen. They will pick off the top 5 GPU-based coins and call it a day. It would be like having somebody sitting there trying to manually block all the porn sites on the internet, by the time you have one entered 3 more have popped into existence.
 
There are so many coins out there that it would be near impossible to filter them all without issuing frequent firmware updates, which isn't going to happen. They will pick off the top 5 GPU-based coins and call it a day. It would be like having somebody sitting there trying to manually block all the porn sites on the internet, by the time you have one entered 3 more have popped into existence.

It doesn't matter how many there are, what I'm saying is the original source said Raven and Ergo are limited yet the video shows they aren't. So the original story is possibly bogus, that's my point.
 
It would be like having somebody sitting there trying to manually block all the porn sites on the internet, by the time you have one entered 3 more have popped into existence.

I think you just stumbled across a great way to describe what they're doing with LHR stuff.

Imagine buying a video card for your gaming PC but it blocked porn because you didn't buy a porn card.

And people are defending that.
 
I think you just stumbled across a great way to describe what they're doing with LHR stuff.

Imagine buying a video card for your gaming PC but it blocked porn because you didn't buy a porn card.

And people are defending that.

I am not sure we need to seek theoretical example, imagine buying a video card that target gaming PC but it blocked accelerated wireframe rendering in a CAD software because you did not buy a pro-tagged card that have it enabled at the driver level seem already closer.But it is not soemthing people would have defended because it did not matter to them.

A class of GPU that do not mine would possibly (almost certainly) end up buying purchasable at a lower price with lesser bot has a competition for them (has their floor value would get lower and lower), making it a net gain for people interested in a gaming card without wanting to use complex and long strategy to get a card and defending it for that reason.
 
I think you just stumbled across a great way to describe what they're doing with LHR stuff.

Imagine buying a video card for your gaming PC but it blocked porn because you didn't buy a porn card.

And people are defending that.
It's more like Nissan gimping the GTR when it knows you're on a public road instead of a track using GPS location.

Porn is available without computers.
 
It sounds logical on its head. Then you see what Nvidia is really doing. Charging a fortune for their washout parts half of which may not even have working video output bits so they are putting them on mining cards they are selling for the the same or MORE then functioning gaming cards. Then as a direct FU to gamers... they release a TI card which is at the outer limits of the silicon meaning overclock them even a little bit and they will fail, and they have the audacity to up the MSRP $200. So you can now buy a TI card for a 60% premium over the non ti that has a 8% performance uplift with no headroom.

I think its become clear to most people that didn't see it out of the gate. This isn't about gamers. This was never about gamers. This was about making more money... this move allows Nvidia to charge miners for their scrap bin parts (non working video output is a common issue with GPUs out of the fab) this allows Nvidia to end the current hot resale market that has been hurting their bottom line for 3 or 4 years now. And to top it off apparently Nvidia also believes this will allow them to make the middle man money themselves... what is the point of mining cards to reduce the push on GPU pricing if Nvidia just jacks MSRP up themselves.

Are they actually offering any busted Ampere dies? I thought all the initial mining cards had been confirmed to be based on last generation 12nm Turing parts.
 
Yeah, that's why I said porn is a better example.
I would imagine virtually everyone that defend the crypto limitation are also non miner (or very casual and would have prefered a lower entry price without mining afterward).
 
There are so many coins out there that it would be near impossible to filter them all without issuing frequent firmware updates, which isn't going to happen. They will pick off the top 5 GPU-based coins and call it a day. It would be like having somebody sitting there trying to manually block all the porn sites on the internet, by the time you have one entered 3 more have popped into existence.

If they can cover 97% or 99% of the market (ether already is ~90% of the GPU coin market) that's probably good enough since it'd only take a small number of cards to flood the remainder down until they're no more profitable than mining the gimped coins is.
 
I would imagine virtually everyone that defend the crypto limitation are also non miner (or very casual and would have prefered a lower entry price without mining afterward).

The problem is that there isn't a lower price. They are just going to substitute LHR cards in at the same price. You are getting less for your money, and people don't care because they THINK miners are the problem.

This is the problem. Right from the article:
At about 7:45 somebody came out offering to sell his tickets (#11 and #14) for $1000 each. People around me were commenting that he would have more luck selling them after they have already finished distributing all the tickets. About 2 minutes later, a Best Buy uniformed employee came by and announced that all 54 tickets were gone. Nobody seemed to move; they just stayed in that line. He also said that there were some people near the front selling their tickets (it did not seem to bother him).

And people think miners don't contribute anything and are greedy. This guy literally just sat in a line and wanted $1000 for the effort.

And then there are "gamers" willing to pay ridiculous scalped prices for a gimped card.
 
As an eBay Associate, HardForum may earn from qualifying purchases.
I would imagine virtually everyone that defend the crypto limitation are also non miner (or very casual and would have prefered a lower entry price without mining afterward).

Right, that’s why porn is a better analogy. Not everyone mines, but…
 
The problem is that there isn't a lower price. They are just going to substitute LHR cards in at the same price. You are getting less for your money, and people don't care because they THINK miners are the problem.
It is almost impossible that it does not end up being in average in the last 12 year's a lower price if you diminish the demand (specially a demand that is ready to pay a fortune for a card, because they calculate how much crypto money they can do with it). I am not sure if it is possible to know the impact that would have over time, but it sound almost impossible for it to not lower it.

From my small anecdote experience, there was 2 big mining bubble and during those 2 times gpu pricing was much higher than the rest of the time.

There is gamers (and streamers of all sort) that also are ready to pay a fortune for a gimped card, but not for 12 of them.
 
What is the actual mechanism by which hash rates are limited? Some kind of smart driver? I'm still waiting to buy a new card for machine learning work, and want something that isn't going to inadvertently cripple my work.
 
What is the actual mechanism by which hash rates are limited? Some kind of smart driver? I'm still waiting to buy a new card for machine learning work, and want something that isn't going to inadvertently cripple my work.
It's a handshake between the driver and the chip itself. So far the only way past it is a developer driver for the 3060 which had the limiter disabled, but that will not work with the newer LHR cards and revised 3060's.
 
Some kind of smart driver?

Ultimately it has to be software because they're not redesigning the chips, and it only happens when some software is running. Now, Nvidia says it's a hardware solution, but that doesn't mean it's particularly fundamental. It could be something as simple as a switch that tells the board to turn off half the RAM. But there's absolutely a driver telling that switch when to do its thing or not.

Also in some tests the cards perform at full speed for a brief amount of time before the cutoff hits, which pretty much requires it to be a software call.
 
Yes, please, go ahead and don't buy. I'm in line for the next 6 months at 30 minutes away in queue. Need all the help I can get, and as someone who's anti-proof-of-work, good riddance. Hillarious to see ANON's threat to Elon musk, it was so cringey I couldn't even watch it until the end. When they started talking about how the government wastes electricity I lol'd hard. It's along the lines of two wrongs make a right. They are right about Musk, but so terribly wrong about world resources and PoW coins. $BTC to 0!

P.S. There are people who do block stuff on the internet, e.g. ISP's in other countries, schools, etc. Still can use a VPN. It still is effective though, for most use cases, so just because a hydra can spawn another head, does not imply it always will.
 
Do mining use tensor-RTX hardware significantly ?

I know nothing so this is based on a quick google search but apparently oustide Raycoin it would not have done much, that integer alu from ethash is quite different from deep learning accelerated hardware.

No, its not specific to RTX hardware for things like Ethash or some others, but the way that the card is designed does make it more favorable from some other elements; I was making a comparison how Nvidia at one time created a feature "cut down" version of their cards with the 1660 in architecture. Something similar could be done that would make it less viable for mining, but it would impact so many other things that NV has staked their reputation for "gaming" ancillary features against they'd refuse to do it. However it could be done, and also by removing those specific things that are not used except for a handful of often proprietary methodologies with limited effect (ie tensor cores) they could have more room and lower costs as it were - but they aren't going to do that because of how they've positioned themselves over the past generation and the current.
 
So We The People found a way to legally print untraceable currency. That's awesome, but did any of you really think it would last?
 
I think you just stumbled across a great way to describe what they're doing with LHR stuff.

Imagine buying a video card for your gaming PC but it blocked porn because you didn't buy a porn card.

And people are defending that.
Not quite, NVidia and AMD already segment their cards based on FP64 performance, they both artificially gimp their consumer cards on this while leaving it open for their work station cards. Product segmentation already exists across their stacks to artificially limit a whole crapload of metrics to separate their professional and consumer products. This is not even a remotely new approach
Crypto mining is huge business, NVidia is just defining a new product stack, without that segmentation neither AMD nor NVidia would be able to justify the existence of 90% of their workstation/server/datacenter product stacks.

it sucks for people who mine from home, but this was an inevitability.
 
Not quite, NVidia and AMD already segment their cards based on FP64 performance, they both artificially gimp their consumer cards on this while leaving it open for their work station cards.

There's pushback there, too. And sometimes free unlocks or "upgrades" when end-users get particularly vocal.
 
That means these cards are much more likely to be gotten by gamers. No, it won't be a drop in the bucket of the ocean of demand, but it still means these cards are much more apt to end up in gamers' systems than a mining farm. I call that a win, even if it means I still probably won't be able to snag one myself.
I think cryptocurrencies are the biggest bullshit around and doing more than their part in destroying the planet, but imposing arbitrary software limits on hardware is not the way.

Nvidia selling perfectly functional silicon and (most likely temporarily) imposing a stupid firmware/driver ban on certain algorithms is a dangerous precedent.
What's next - didn't pay your monthly subscription so Nvidia pushes an update to disable half your VRAM/RTX functionality/shader units?
 
Nvidia selling perfectly functional silicon and (most likely temporarily) imposing a stupid firmware/driver ban on certain algorithms is a dangerous precedent.
What's next - didn't pay your monthly subscription so Nvidia pushes an update to disable half your VRAM/RTX functionality/shader units?
One of many no, I remember in the 90s making mt computer think my ti 4200 card was a quadro for 3dsmax with some bios-driver trick, isn't a lot of functionality bared at a driver level and not at the silicon level ?
 
One of many no, I remember in the 90s making mt computer think my ti 4200 card was a quadro for 3dsmax with some bios-driver trick, isn't a lot of functionality bared at a driver level and not at the silicon level ?

Nvidia's a lot greedier and sophisticated since those days.
 
It's not anonymous. Just ask Ross Ulbricht. Or even the pipeline hackers.

Well, that's true - I was definitely exaggerating to make a point. We live in a world where, let's just call them the major governments of world, will only allow the lowly peasants to have things that they can tax, control, and regulate. I can't prove it, but my gut tells me that there is a "hidden hand" in all of this, and as many of us sit here and blame miners, scalpers, upper respiratory infections or anything else for the GPU shortage, I think we should at least remain open to the idea that the real answer might be "None of the Above."
 
Ultimately it has to be software because they're not redesigning the chips, and it only happens when some software is running. Now, Nvidia says it's a hardware solution, but that doesn't mean it's particularly fundamental. It could be something as simple as a switch that tells the board to turn off half the RAM. But there's absolutely a driver telling that switch when to do its thing or not.

Also in some tests the cards perform at full speed for a brief amount of time before the cutoff hits, which pretty much requires it to be a software call.
There is enough money in Crypto that this will ultimately get worked around in some driver hack down the road fast enough, I give it a month, 2 tops. It's basically hardware DRM, it will detur the casual miner but the hardcore operations will be around this in no time. NVidia knows this so the biggest question I have is now is NVidia incentivizing their CMP cards to the big operations who order in the 10's of thousands because that is who those are marketed too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Axman
like this
Back
Top