No ulterior reason to deny this.Lisa already tweeted down this horseshit.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No ulterior reason to deny this.Lisa already tweeted down this horseshit.
No ulterior reason to deny this.
She straight up denied the rumor, did not pussy foot around nor ignore it. But hey, it is AMD so........
Also, not sure when Wccftech became your go to source so......
Lu said she is not leaving, that it's just a rumor and yet here we are 3 pages later
This is [H], which is predominately against AMD, would you expect any less?
This is [H], which is predominately against AMD, would you expect any less?
So here is what I find interesting.
Do enough research, connect a few dots, and you know:
a) Intel pays people to pretend to be everyday normal people on tech forums in order to influence people.
b) There has been a shit ton of FUD being spread about AMD ever since Ryzen 3 launch and AMD just ripping a whole ton of market share from Intel
c) the fake Lisa su article came 24h before the launch of rome, which blows away the current Intel offering
And then all of a sudden, some people rush in and say that even though it's easy to connect the dots we are all just imagining it, which leads me to my fourth point:
d) Intel has been found guilty in a court of law trying all sorts of dirty tricks against AMD before.
So not only is it easy to connect the dots, Intel has a history of dirty, underhanded, and even illegal tactics.
At this point I would be extremely skeptical of anyone who tries to justify that or else tell everyone to dismiss it. Basically giving them the side eye and ask them " you on their payroll?"
Do enough research, connect a few dots, and you know:
a) Intel pays people to pretend to be everyday normal people on tech forums in order to influence people.
b) There has been a shit ton of FUD being spread about AMD ever since Ryzen 3 launch and AMD just ripping a whole ton of market share from Intel
c) the fake Lisa su article came 24h before the launch of rome, which blows away the current Intel offering
And then all of a sudden, some people rush in and say that even though it's easy to connect the dots we are all just imagining it, which leads me to my fourth point:
d) Intel has been found guilty in a court of law trying all sorts of dirty tricks against AMD before.
At this point I would be extremely skeptical of anyone who tries to justify that or else tell everyone to dismiss it.
Basically giving them the side eye and ask them " you on their payroll?"
Doesn't Nvidia rely on outside fabs too? Samsung? Maybe you were only meaning this against Intel who still has their own fabs? I'm hoping with their increased revenues they can at least maintain if not expand their R&D budget, but that's not my call obviously.Very interesting perception.
I find [H] largely against Intel and Nvidia, and would prefer instead to see an even accounting of each.
And if AMDs R&D investments are going to start tapering off their product releases- well, now's the time for Dr. Su to jump. AMD is going to be relying on outside fabs to push the laws of physics in order to keep improving their processors, and that's going to be a tall order with Intel and Nvidia for competition.
Doesn't Nvidia rely on outside fabs too? Samsung? Maybe you were only meaning this against Intel who still has their own fabs? I'm hoping with their increased revenues they can at least maintain if not expand their R&D budget, but that's not my call obviously.
So here is what I find interesting.
Do enough research, connect a few dots, and you know:
a) Intel pays people to pretend to be everyday normal people on tech forums in order to influence people.
b) There has been a shit ton of FUD being spread about AMD ever since Ryzen 3 launch and AMD just ripping a whole ton of market share from Intel
c) the fake Lisa su article came 24h before the launch of rome, which blows away the current Intel offering
And then all of a sudden, some people rush in and say that even though it's easy to connect the dots we are all just imagining it, which leads me to my fourth point:
d) Intel has been found guilty in a court of law trying all sorts of dirty tricks against AMD before.
So not only is it easy to connect the dots, Intel has a history of dirty, underhanded, and even illegal tactics.
At this point I would be extremely skeptical of anyone who tries to justify that or else tell everyone to dismiss it. Basically giving them the side eye and ask them " you on their payroll?"
So here is what I find interesting.
Do enough research, connect a few dots, and you know:
a) Intel pays people to pretend to be everyday normal people on tech forums in order to influence people.
I’ve dedicated the last six years of my life to this company, and there is more work to do. And I’m here to make this company successful, and I’m excited about the new strategy. So lots more work to do, and I actually am not going anywhere.
Now is the right time for Antonio and a new generation of leaders to take the reins of HPE. I have tremendous confidence that they will continue to build a great company that will thrive well into the future
So here is what I find interesting.
Do enough research, connect a few dots, and you know:
a) Intel pays people to pretend to be everyday normal people on tech forums in order to influence people.
b) There has been a shit ton of FUD being spread about AMD ever since Ryzen 3 launch and AMD just ripping a whole ton of market share from Intel
c) the fake Lisa su article came 24h before the launch of rome, which blows away the current Intel offering
And then all of a sudden, some people rush in and say that even though it's easy to connect the dots we are all just imagining it, which leads me to my fourth point:
d) Intel has been found guilty in a court of law trying all sorts of dirty tricks against AMD before.
So not only is it easy to connect the dots, Intel has a history of dirty, underhanded, and even illegal tactics.
At this point I would be extremely skeptical of anyone who tries to justify that or else tell everyone to dismiss it. Basically giving them the side eye and ask them " you on their payroll?"
Tricks that AMD would just as willingly pull, because this is business.
Exactly.
Granted, Intel isn't the only company doing this on social media, and they're generally less rude than some of the other players (look around, Microsoft and Netflix are among the worst), but I'm intensely peeved by any company that engages in well-poisoning behavior to control the narrative on social media.
Can you cite any examples of AMD engaging in any of the behaviors mentioned? How about any suspicious frivolous lawsuits or rumours that coincide with Intel product launches?
If the best you guys can come up with is a marketing campaign from 2013 where AMD/OEM's gave away some laptops to influencers on Facebook... that's pretty weak.
It's not like CEOs have never gone on the record to say they're not leaving anytime soon only to turn around and announce their resignation a few months later. They kinda have to since they're obligated to protect shareholder value, and part of that is minimizing uncertainty. A CEO possibly leaving with no known path forward will hurt value over a longer period of time than a CEO actually leaving with a plan and a replacement in place.
However, in the same earnings call, Whitman did admit that she was at least enticed by the open CEO position at Uber after its former CEO Travis Kalanick stepped down in June. "There has been some press," she said. "Listen, I thought -- I was called in very late in the Uber search, and I thought it was a very interesting business model."
Exactly.
Granted, Intel isn't the only company doing this on social media, and they're generally less rude than some of the other players (look around, Microsoft and Netflix are among the worst), but I'm intensely peeved by any company that engages in well-poisoning behavior to control the narrative on social media.
Can you cite any examples of AMD engaging in any of the behaviors mentioned? How about any suspicious frivolous lawsuits or rumours that coincide with Intel product launches?
If the best you guys can come up with is a marketing campaign from 2013 where AMD/OEM's gave away some laptops to influencers on Facebook... that's pretty weak.
False! Go read your article you gave. It's not what he is talking about, not even close. You are confusing marketing (a test run in india at that) that was open with full disclosure, with Intel's secret illegal tactics and payoffs. They are so different, there is no way to even come close to making them equal the same thing, no matter how you try to stretch it.Nice quick edit...but your bluff was called...sorry it makes you angry, but those are the facts...they even had a point system and it was a lot bigger than "giving away a few laptops"...
"Whataboutism" is actually a key identifier. Why defend a position when you think an argument from the other side is silly in the first place?
So a dismissal followed by whataboutism or vice versa is a VERY good tell...
1. Cites
2. This is what normal people do in discussions- and depending on the context, it's fair game.
The white-kniting for AMD is silly. They're a corporation. They do corporation stuff. Their goal is to make money. The CEO position may be special to The Faithful, but it's still just a job.
Get over it.
Otherwise its the equivalent of getting upset because other guys are drooling at your hot girlfriend.
In fairness, there's a type of "underdog PTSD" that may be at play here. People got so used to their brand being slapped and then backhanded for so long, that now that AMD is having a certifiable Renaissance, any critical analysis is perceived as just another attack on the hive.I think that's the best description I've heard of The Faithful so far!
...Yet so many illogical marketeers here...
Un-bias people can spot the bias ones a million miles away, because we have no stake in the game...