Warning of “Ecological Armageddon” After 75% Plunge in Insect Numbers

Megalith

24-bit/48kHz
Staff member
Joined
Aug 20, 2006
Messages
13,000
The abundance of flying insects has plunged by three-quarters over the past 25 years, according to a new study that has shocked scientists. The cause of the huge decline is as yet unclear, although the destruction of wild areas and widespread use of pesticides are the most likely factors and climate change may play a role. The scientists were able to rule out weather and changes to landscape in the reserves as causes, but data on pesticide levels has not been collected.

The research, published in the journal Plos One, is based on the work of dozens of amateur entomologists across Germany who began using strictly standardised ways of collecting insects in 1989. Special tents called malaise traps were used to capture more than 1,500 samples of all flying insects at 63 different nature reserves. When the total weight of the insects in each sample was measured a startling decline was revealed. The annual average fell by 76% over the 27 year period, but the fall was even higher – 82% – in summer, when insect numbers reach their peak.
 
pesticides working as intended.

I know we really only want to kill the ones that bite us and spread disease, but I don't think there are many ways to target specific insects.
What we do is akin to carpet bombing. 100% effective at killing everything in the zone, collateral be damned.
 
I think it's pretty clear that we, humans, are unable to be a part of nature and it has been this way for a very long time. Even if we really want - we can't. Humans have caused extinctions of many animal species way before civilisation rose, and now, with all the technology available to us that amplifies everything we do - it's just getting worse. Sure, there's "green" this and "green" that, but it's more of a token at this point.
I hope I'm wrong, but it sure doesn't seem like it. We're unable to be a part of a healthy ecosystem - we always try to "fix" it even though we can't even fully comprehend or understand it.
 
Hmmm.....
Hmmm indeed, now many the hundreds of amateur biologists, climate change experts, and other things won't be able to knee jerk a response "FOLLOW THE MONEY!!!!! These environwackos just want to live up their fat cat ways with free money!"
 
I remember in a science class we were supposed to go out and catch and kill a bunch of bugs. Me and most of my classmates ended up buying them from a dude. That was 25 years ago give or take, but I hardly ever see colorful bugs anymore like dragonflies that were abundant back then.
 
As much as I would be happy to see cockroaches, mosquitoes, and flies wiped out for good, this could be very bad news. Bees, for example, are key species to entire ecosystems. Get rid of them, and you get rid of the next generation of flowering plants, too.
 
The only good bug, is a dead bug.

az271S.gif
 
Even mosquitoes have a purpose, though how big of one is debatable. They function as pollinators as well as food sources for some animals (birds, bats, fish, etc.).

Of course IMO, which is darker than any scientist would consider saying, is that their biggest role is population control for humans :) As we continue to try to stamp out blood-born diseases carried by insects we are limiting natures way of "culling the heard" to a certain extent.
 
These guys clearly haven't done any of their studies in Alberta, Canada. Where the mosquito's reign supreme.
 
Good, time for all those indestructible Roaches to start earning their keep....pollinate, you useless parasites on the grease-pits of our society........
 
This is an article strictly about data collection in Germany. Not sure if it's even applicable outside of the confines of their research. All those specimens may merely have migrated to another more suitable environment, or the weather they experienced during that timeframe was outside of the bell curve.
 
This is an article strictly about data collection in Germany. Not sure if it's even applicable outside of the confines of their research. All those specimens may merely have migrated to another more suitable environment, or the weather they experienced during that timeframe was outside of the bell curve.
Even the flying insects escaped the clutches of Merkel's diversity programs.
 
I remember in a science class we were supposed to go out and catch and kill a bunch of bugs. Me and most of my classmates ended up buying them from a dude. That was 25 years ago give or take, but I hardly ever see colorful bugs anymore like dragonflies that were abundant back then.

Part of the reason is that certain bugs/insects have migrated to different parts of the country.

For example, this past summer there were a huge massive number of "love" bugs in Alabama. First time I had ever seen more than a few. They were absolutely everywhere.

At the same time, the numbers of other bugs/insects have not seemed to go down at all. If anything they have been more abundant as well.

I'm guessing that my location is not the only one where the bug/insect population has shifted from what it used to be to something else.

The natural weather cycles play a big part I am guessing. Note... I didn't say climate change.
 
Note... I didn't say climate change.

What's the matter with "climate change"? The climate changes all the time, and has for all the history of the Earth. What is causing the change is what is up for debate among us humans.
 
There are just to many people. I think in future governments will set population limits... they'll have to. What's sustainable? 2 billion?
 
How many of the dead bugs are mosquitoes... because we are killing the shit out of them on purpose for pretty sound reasons.
 
".....and climate change may play a role"

Or maybe not! We don't friggin know, but we better mention climate change because climate change!!!
 
".....and climate change may play a role"

Or maybe not! We don't friggin know, but we better mention climate change because climate change!!!

Man, seriously. You hit it on the head.

The news nowadays is like a vegan trying to find every damned excuse to tell you they are vegan, so freaking sick of it.
 
Almost all of the decline was found the same year they started the new standard...What a shock? They are also only checking bulk weight, not types, sizes or individual count. The biggest of ALL factors is they did NOT sample from the same locations for this time frame, straight from the paper: "Our data do not represent longitudinal records at single sites, suitable to derive location specific trends". The first year of the new testing saw a drop from 8 grams to about 3.7 grams, after the first year till 2016 it has gone up and down, from as high as 6 grams to as low as 1.7, to the 2016 data of 2.1. However if you are not sampling the same area each time, you can not claim a drop and they even make notes that the other variations were due to seasonal changes.

But hey, HYSTERIA, now give me more funding!
 
What's the matter with "climate change"? The climate changes all the time, and has for all the history of the Earth. What is causing the change is what is up for debate among us humans.

I refrain from using the term "climate change" because then all the wackos who think that we humans can actually affect the climate start coming out of the woodwork like flies swarm to feces.
 
Almost all of the decline was found the same year they started the new standard...What a shock? They are also only checking bulk weight, not types, sizes or individual count. The biggest of ALL factors is they did NOT sample from the same locations for this time frame, straight from the paper: "Our data do not represent longitudinal records at single sites, suitable to derive location specific trends". The first year of the new testing saw a drop from 8 grams to about 3.7 grams, after the first year till 2016 it has gone up and down, from as high as 6 grams to as low as 1.7, to the 2016 data of 2.1. However if you are not sampling the same area each time, you can not claim a drop and they even make notes that the other variations were due to seasonal changes.

But hey, HYSTERIA, now give me more funding!
In other words, bad science. I hate bad science.
 
Back
Top