TaintedSquirrel
[H]F Junkie
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2013
- Messages
- 12,689
Nope, Skylake had a scattered release. Kaby Lake was all at once, maybe.So, the exact opposite of how they normally do it....?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nope, Skylake had a scattered release. Kaby Lake was all at once, maybe.So, the exact opposite of how they normally do it....?
Skylake launched in same fashion.So, the exact opposite of how they normally do it....?
silicon lottery only sold 4.8 SKL but sells 5.2 KBYI don't agree it was like that.
Kaby is a REAL STRAIN for 5.0 but possible for regular overclockers
Skylake is a REAL STRAIN for 4.8 but possible for regular overclockers
200mhz, not 400mhz - there's only so much 14nm can do, with all the +++++ in the world.
Who says they'll get even more?
Also, Kaby has insane, random RUN WILD HOT issues.
I'm not convinced Coffee++ (at least the 6 core) will exceed 4.5ghz.
So, is it really confirmed that coffee lake 6C/12T will be 1151 ? I heard otherwise! It will be great if it is really 1151 so that i7 7700K with Z270 will have something to upgrade to.
Thanks.
Genuine Intel(R) CPU 0000 @ 3.10GHz (6C 12T 3.1GHz/4.2GHz, 2.7GHz IMC/3.9GHz, 6x 256kB L2, 12MB L3)
http://ranker.sisoftware.net/show_r...d4ecddefd6e5d3f587ba8aacc9ac91a187f4c9f1&l=en
Looks like the first stepping, so clocks should improve till launch.
So, is it really confirmed that coffee lake 6C/12T will be 1151 ? I heard otherwise! It will be great if it is really 1151 so that i7 7700K with Z270 will have something to upgrade to.
Thanks.
That sucks big time.This is darth vader, I mean, intel we're talking about: never ever assume just because they are using the same socket pin-out that it will be compatible, they can alter their terms whenever they want and all you can do is pray.
There might be a psuedo-legitimate reason about VRMs and power requirements etc (though on overclocker/high-end boards that would be total bullshit) or they might block it "just because" to sell 300-series chipsets.
Wait till August to get the 6C / 12T on the mainstream platform or wait about the same time and consider the Ryzen 1700. Most gaming will have little use for 20 threads.
Wondering though if that 6/8 core will be gimped with lower count PCI-e lanes/dual channel memory, etc.?
Two chips, one HT and one not.
6C12T: http://ranker.sisoftware.net/show_r...d4ecddefd6e5d3f587ba8aacc9ac91a187f4c9f1&l=en
6C6T: http://ranker.sisoftware.net/show_r...d4ecddeddaeadef88ab787a1c4a19cac8af9c4fc&l=en
i5 6C/6T maybe.
Wondering though if that 6/8 core will be gimped with lower count PCI-e lanes/dual channel memory, etc.?
I suspect it may be gimped more with a lower clockspeed so as not to make the 7800k look like a weaker part.
The 7700K boosts 4.5 GHz I would be really surprised to see a 6c12t chip hit the same stock. Unless you mean 1 or 2 loaded cores etc.No.
CFL-S K will be a 4Ghz+ part with 4.5Ghz+ turbo.
The 7700K boosts 4.5 GHz I would be really surprised to see a 6c12t chip hit the same stock. Unless you mean 1 or 2 loaded cores etc.
Skylake launched in same fashion.
Hell, even Kaby first had higher end SKUs then lower end including the famed G4560.
Or they are going to keep clock speeds on the lower end so that the HEDT 7800k doesnt look like a wasted part. Its going to be interesting to see what the final specs are going to be. Realistically, kaby lake-x and the 7800k should not exist alongside x370 skylake unless intel intentionally handicaps coffee lake in someway. I could almost see it if they kept the original launch window of January so you didnt have both platforms competing with each other, but releasing them right on top of each other? That just makes no sense to me.
Well, if you consider the whole stack then yes, Kaby was mobile first.No? Laptop chips in August 2016, Desktop in Feb 2017?
i5 is semiconfirmed to be 4/8 tho. So I wouldn't put my bets on it.
Sure? But...... I'm right, aren't I?Well, if you consider the whole stack then yes, Kaby was mobile first.
On desktop however, high end SKUs came before low end.
You keep speaking with authority as if you have inside scoops, you either know this factually, or you don't.Wccftech articles is full of errors and misleading tho.
Coffee Lake K models comes in august.
For the socket you have to work. But the latest Sandra leaks shows a CFL-S chip on a Kaby Lake platform.
You are, but Kaby Lake is not exactly the norm, is it? Neither was Broadwell, for that matter.Sure? But...... I'm right, aren't I?
You keep speaking with authority as if you have inside scoops, you either know this factually, or you don't.
Exactly Exactly, we all hope you're wrong but it totally makes sense. Otherwise they're kinda doubling up here.
VT-d will go or something again, they'll pull something nice out, to bone people.
Question.
The 6C line is topping out at 95W, which is about the same as the 7700K (91W). Compare that to Intel's existing 6C chips (6800K and 7800X for example) which are 140W. What kind of performance hindrance are we going to see from such a low TDP?
How can Intel run a 6c chip with the same power limit as a 4c8t chip and not expect performance loss, ie lower clocks.
I was just going by the TDP from their specs.
4.5Ghz is single core turbo for the 7700K. Else its a 4.2Ghz chip.
I actually expect CFL-S to turbo higher than 7700K due to 14nm++. Perhaps 4.7Ghz.
called speculationAre you talking about the 4c/8t or the 6c/12t coffee lake part. I havent seen final clock speeds for coffee lake released yet.
Are you talking about the 4c/8t or the 6c/12t coffee lake part. I havent seen final clock speeds for coffee lake released yet.
called speculation