Don't feel like looking too hard or wasting time on it but this is what is on INTELs own site:
Err they used that line for their entire i7 line
http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/processors/core/i7-processors.html
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don't feel like looking too hard or wasting time on it but this is what is on INTELs own site:
Saying it can do something is not the same thing as marketing to a specific market segment like AMD did with gamers and RyzenDon't feel like looking too hard or wasting time on it but this is what is on INTELs own site:
Just to give a heads up, the cold bug is not real Timer is off its not measuring the time right
Synthetics maybe, but not anything that actually measures how quick a real task is executed.Doesn't that mean some benchmark result could be off?
Just to give a heads up, the cold bug is not real Timer is off its not measuring the time right
Doesn't that mean some benchmark result could be off?
looks llike what happened with the windows 8 intel RTC bug
not that big of a deal.
Played Robo Recall for a good while last night on my Ryzen 1700 at 3.966GHz without a hitch.I was gaming more tonight on my Crosshair VI @ DDR4-3200 speed and 3.8ghz Air OC and I was getting rediculous performance.
just throwing it out there since these chips are pure concentrated shit for gaming apparently.
My Oculus Rift is running Flawless with my touch controllers on my 980ti and 1700X OC with fast ram.
Well, I guess Jim is a lot better connected than all the engineers I talk to at AMD. Because I am not hearing that much confidence from inside AMD. That all said, we will tell you what is happening now, and if things change in the future, we will surely tell you then as well.Kyle, A Ryzen 1800X demo machine at my local Micro Center smashed the world record for single and multicore performance for CPUZ. He is also running a whole string of benchmarks that will soon be posted on-line. Jim , the sales tech in the cpu area , has been configuring the machine with hardware specified by AMD. 32 GB of DDR4 3200 Dominator Platinum, Nvidia GTX 1080 etc. I believe the Motherboard is ROG Crosshair VI Hero. The cpu is overclocked to 4.05 GHZ and cooled right now with a Kracken 60. That may change as additional hardware s to be added and replace certain items. I will try to keep you posted. Perhaps he can upload some results to my flash drive so I can post it here on the site.
Jim is confident that within a couple months enough gamin otimizations plus better bios stability and memory speeds will neate most of the less than impressive gaming results seen at launch. He said the bios issues hurt oerformance a great deal with added latencies, He expects major windows scheduler revisions to be completed in a few months.
It's those 480's sucking all the power through the PCI-e there is none left for the CPUI see now why Ryzen is performing so poorly. Look at that clock speed...
Doesn't that mean some benchmark result could be off?
Kyle, A Ryzen 1800X demo machine at my local Micro Center smashed the world record for single and multicore performance for CPUZ. He is also running a whole string of benchmarks that will soon be posted on-line. Jim , the sales tech in the cpu area , has been configuring the machine with hardware specified by AMD. 32 GB of DDR4 3200 Dominator Platinum, Nvidia GTX 1080 etc. I believe the Motherboard is ROG Crosshair VI Hero. The cpu is overclocked to 4.05 GHZ and cooled right now with a Kracken 60. That may change as additional hardware s to be added and replace certain items. I will try to keep you posted. Perhaps he can upload some results to my flash drive so I can post it here on the site.
Jim is confident that within a couple months enough gamin otimizations plus better bios stability and memory speeds will neate most of the less than impressive gaming results seen at launch. He said the bios issues hurt oerformance a great deal with added latencies, He expects major windows scheduler revisions to be completed in a few months.
Kyle, A Ryzen 1800X demo machine at my local Micro Center smashed the world record for single and multicore performance for CPUZ. He is also running a whole string of benchmarks that will soon be posted on-line. Jim , the sales tech in the cpu area , has been configuring the machine with hardware specified by AMD. 32 GB of DDR4 3200 Dominator Platinum, Nvidia GTX 1080 etc. I believe the Motherboard is ROG Crosshair VI Hero. The cpu is overclocked to 4.05 GHZ and cooled right now with a Kracken 60. That may change as additional hardware s to be added and replace certain items. I will try to keep you posted. Perhaps he can upload some results to my flash drive so I can post it here on the site.
Jim is confident that within a couple months enough gamin otimizations plus better bios stability and memory speeds will neate most of the less than impressive gaming results seen at launch. He said the bios issues hurt oerformance a great deal with added latencies, He expects major windows scheduler revisions to be completed in a few months.
Some people have managed to run it at high speeds long enough for benches:That RAM recommendation is hilarious given that Ryzen can't clock RAM that high right now. Either this "Jim" is super well connected as Kyle said, or he's talking out his ass.
Some people have managed to run it at high speeds long enough for benches:
http://www.eteknix.com/memory-speed-large-impact-ryzen-performance/
~14% Witcher FPS from 2400 to 3200
Of course they did not bother to mention the board they used so get out your salt shaker
Note that Witcher itself is a memory-speed sensitive game.Some people have managed to run it at high speeds long enough for benches:
http://www.eteknix.com/memory-speed-large-impact-ryzen-performance/
~14% Witcher FPS from 2400 to 3200
Of course they did not bother to mention the board they used so get out your salt shaker
That RAM recommendation is hilarious given that Ryzen can't clock RAM that high right now. Either this "Jim" is super well connected as Kyle said, or he's talking out his ass.
I have a new rig up for testing with trident Z 3200 rgb, works a charmIm running my 3200 LPX at 3029 or something like that right now. Id have to check but its def stable and verifiable. Crosshair VI using ram off the QVL.
Im running my 3200 LPX at 3029 or something like that right now. Id have to check but its def stable and verifiable. Crosshair VI using ram off the QVL.
Asus is good but the Aorus 5 is betterI guess I shouldn't be surprised that an ASUS motherboard could do it when no other one will. ASUS is routinely first with finalizing its UEFI. ASUS often has something in the secret sauce with its UEFI BIOS. We saw that with the benchmarks on the Z170 motherboards. ASUS lead the pack in almost all cases. Real world performance is another matter though.
This chart is literally taken from Z270 motherboard page.Some people have managed to run it at high speeds long enough for benches:
http://www.eteknix.com/memory-speed-large-impact-ryzen-performance/
~14% Witcher FPS from 2400 to 3200
Of course they did not bother to mention the board they used so get out your salt shaker
This chart is literally taken from Z270 motherboard page.
The Witcher 3 one. Geekbench may be legit, but ya'll forgetting that it has 3 memory subtests that obviously scale up with memory.The geek bench one?
Uhm... Just in case, timings on both were C15 or something similar, right? Because that's... way worse scaling that one would expect.I did my own testing using CS:GO on low 720p.
292fps with ddr4 2133
312fps with ddr4 3000
The Witcher 3 one. Geekbench may be legit, but ya'll forgetting that it has 3 memory subtests that obviously scale up with memory.
Uhm... Just in case, timings on both were C15 or something similar, right? Because that's... way worse scaling that one would expect.
Anyways, Ryzen apparently performs poorly in Adobe's software too (granted, Broadwell-E performs poorly there too), but just saying.
That RAM recommendation is hilarious given that Ryzen can't clock RAM that high right now. Either this "Jim" is super well connected as Kyle said, or he's talking out his ass.
Isn't Adobe's stuff still more relying on single threaded than more cores, threads, etc?
I mean, according to G.Skill it can. All you need to do is run modified BCLK, Samsung B-die and appropriately chosen die. But the trick here is that i do not remember Corsair using B-die in their stuffThat RAM recommendation is hilarious given that Ryzen can't clock RAM that high right now. Either this "Jim" is super well connected as Kyle said, or he's talking out his ass.
Yeah, so both C15... Weird as hell.its CL15 3000 -- i didnt check the timings at 2133 -- only installed windows and one pass at stock settings. then i updated bios and set the profile, re-ran benchmark
The aggregate is pretty goodThis is the most extensive list of gaming benchmarks for Ryzen i have seen so far 16 games tested
http://www.techspot.com/review/1348-amd-ryzen-gaming-performance/
I found it to be the best because clearly Ryzen is fine in most games but there are some real odd outliers here like Hitman and ROTR all in DX12 mode.The aggregate is pretty good
I found it to be the best because clearly Ryzen is fine in most games but there are some real odd outliers here like Hitman and ROTR all in DX12 mode.
Also of note is the fact there are still GPU limited games even at 1080. The division is clearly hitting a GPU bottleneck there no other explanation as to why all the games are at the exact same frames even the Pentium is not far off.Most likely the games behaviour
Also of note is the fact there are still GPU limited games even at 1080. The division is clearly hitting a GPU bottleneck there no other explanation as to why all the games are at the exact same frames even the Pentium is not far off.
Right. The Division looks like a GPU bottleneck though. Hitman and ROTR is odd because they scale fine on Broadwell E, so it probably has something to do with a conflict specific to Ryzen's architecture.Most games sit on the GPU, no game really scales beyond 4 threads with great efficiency. I think the issue with the few anomaly titles is that they conflict with Ryzen and how the CPU gets to its peak performance
But that again isn't how it works. Ryzen isn't losing because the game puts a bigger demand on the CPU at this point. All it does it is cause the GPU to ask the CPU for page refreshes as fast as it can handle them and for the most part no processor in these tests are sitting at 99%. The fact is more CPU stressful games are asking the system for more actual work to get done. When that happens it's usually a developer actually leveraging MT tasks to increase CPU processing to handle things like Physics, AI, and other CPU used tasks. When those things happen (like BF MP) the Ryzen shines.
On top of all that. Outside uber competitive CSgo (pro) players, all most everyone keeps the GPU as the bottleneck (for looks). That shift keeps moving and as long as the CPU can send the workload needed for GPU, then there isn't an issue, and these again have for some reason I don't understand actually have Ryzen very very very slightly ahead (normal variance if it wasn't so wide spread). That 2 FPS at 1440 high probably matters more than 20 FPS at 1080p low.