D
Deleted member 82943
Guest
fair enough, i just know myself and others here are foaming at the mouth waiting to see these reviews.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
2.1GHz stable clock speeds during usage and keeping the GPU at 67C during the Paragon demo. I think that speaks for itself.Lets hope that they put some R&D into the cooler and that it can provide those "premium" temperatures.
You would be stupid to drink the Koolaid about performance, even if it is 100% true.Lots of PR and I am not saying it was bullshit or wasn't, but Ill wait for reviewers to come through
Did you read the article? Lots of information there and I directly addressed this... It seems half the people commenting did not read it. And I really wrote it to better inform you guys.That it's a cherry picked card?
I am not saying the Founder's Edition is higher binned. I am saying the card he demoed and all the cards being sent out to reviewers are cherry picked. If these cards simply just ran at 2.1Ghz, they would be clocked at 2.1Ghz.
I am suggesting that is absolutely not the case. There is s big story to be told about that, that involved people I have known for two decades that I am sure would not lie to me. That and the fact that I got the same story from multiple people that I have known for a long time.I am not saying the Founder's Edition is higher binned. I am saying the card he demoed and all the cards being sent out to reviewers are cherry picked. If these cards simply just ran at 2.1Ghz with no problems at all, they would be clocked at 2.1Ghz.
Yes...Yeah that would suck if we find out that is what is happening. Only way to find out is see what [H] owners say with their retail cards.
We were watching that card pull a framerate that Tim Sweeney had never seen in the Paragon demo. That 1080 was specifically overclocked for that demo to impress Tim Sweeney. He had never seen it run team time smoothly and it took a bit of on-site overclocking for that to happen.And how do we know that GPU Boost didn't detect a low load and shoot the clocks to the moon and if a heavy load were to occur, the clocks would drop well below 2ghz?
And how do we know that GPU Boost didn't detect a low load and shoot the clocks to the moon and if a heavy load were to occur, the clocks would drop well below 2ghz?
Well let's not get totally nuts now. I was excited about Bulldozer too.eh let's just trust Kyle on this and give nVidia the benefit of the doubt: maybe they pulled off something really cool
Vapor chamber coolers first came stock on Nvidia cards way back on the GTX 580. AMD debuted them a full year earlier than that with the 5970. So they're not exactly new technology. I doubt having a vapor chamber cooler is worth a $100 price premium by itself.If it's anything like the Titan cooler, which if it has a vapor chamber it sounds like it is, will be worth it IMO.
I agree. Money in your pocket or use the $100 to go towards a GPU water block for a custom loop or closed loop system like the Arctic Cooling cooler.Vapor chamber coolers first came stock on Nvidia cards way back on the GTX 580. AMD debuted them a full year earlier than that with the 5970. So they're not exactly new technology. I doubt having a vapor chamber cooler is worth a $100 price premium by itself.