Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bonus points if this follows a 1 x 4 x 9 sizing ratio (call it the monolith, 1^2 x 2^2 x 3^2)
I'd also like to see it wide enough to look like HAL
I am curious, would an SFX-L PSU (e.g. SX500-LG) fit into the chassis? Looking at the pictures makes me uncertain.
Would be nice since having 120mm PSU fan should help keep noise in check.
What would be cool is to make the power button a touch sensor, like on the xbox/ps4, and place it behind the NCASE logo. Then you wouldn't need all the room for a mechanical switch and just tap the logo.
Oh heavens no. I loathe touch sensitive buttons. I like physical confirmation when I press something. Plus regular buttons tend to work better.What would be cool is to make the power button a touch sensor, like on the xbox/ps4, and place it behind the NCASE logo. Then you wouldn't need all the room for a mechanical switch and just tap the logo.
Touch sensor "buttons" are 0% cool, 50% working and 100% annoying. A real mechanical button is always better, in every conceivable way.
What would be cool is to make the power button a touch sensor, like on the xbox/ps4, and place it behind the NCASE logo. Then you wouldn't need all the room for a mechanical switch and just tap the logo.
Is it really considered good design practice to hide essential functionality?
Isn't that the entire purpose of the PC case itself?
All the components are hidden away inside, all the ports are hidden around the back.. an open test bench would work just as well.
Maybe we shouldn't obscure the reset function and drive activity light, and have those all separate and clearly labeled to avoid any confusion..
Isn't that the entire purpose of the PC case itself?
All the components are hidden away inside, all the ports are hidden around the back.. an open test bench would work just as well.
Maybe we shouldn't obscure the reset function and drive activity light, and have those all separate and clearly labeled to avoid any confusion..
No, no it's not. In some design/engineering circles it's even called the three seashells problem.Is it really considered good design practice to hide essential functionality?
Superb design and I really hope that it gets to production.
Any reason though that the USB ports can't form more of a natural line with the logo near the top edge like this?: -
Aesthetically I think it just seems nicer to have them parallel to the edge and mirroring the shape and orientation of both the logo and the front panel.
Touch sensor "buttons" are 0% cool, 50% working and 100% annoying. A real mechanical button is always better, in every conceivable way.
Hi guys,
Just an idea to have the power switch and the logo in the correct orientation with both horizontal and vertical case. I didn't check if that will lead to an issue internally...
The button on the stand will be aligned with the one on the front face and thus pushing on the latter when pressed.
The stand has to be high enough to hide the front face logo, and it will have to be adapted if a space for some air is needed.
Both these ideas would add extra complexity, cost, and development time. It's also one thing to create something that works as a one-off, but significantly different to design something to be manufactured. Basically, if we wanted to do something like that we'd have to hire an engineer who understands DFM, at the very least, or even contract with an industrial design/product development firm (which, needless to say, is quite expensive). I wonder if people are aware of how much money and manpower it takes to design and develop the hardware for something like a modern console...What would be cool is to make the power button a touch sensor, like on the xbox/ps4, and place it behind the NCASE logo. Then you wouldn't need all the room for a mechanical switch and just tap the logo.
I'm back and forth on it. The current design reuses our existing molds for the USB ports, which would save cost, and I'm not sure a new module could have the ports as close to the power switch as shown in your image. It doesn't look quite as nice if they have to be spaced farther apart.Superb design and I really hope that it gets to production.
Any reason though that the USB ports can't form more of a natural line with the logo near the top edge like this?
We didn't get a cost breakdown, but I doubt it.speaking of which:
the m1 came with so many screws, nuts, and other accessories that quite frankly were just plain excessive for anyone who wasn't going full blown custom water cooling. And it also came with dust filters. Did this significantly add to the overall cost? just curious.
I'm back and forth on it. The current design reuses our existing molds for the USB ports, which would save cost, and I'm not sure a new module could have the ports as close to the power switch as shown in your image. It doesn't look quite as nice if they have to be spaced farther apart.
No. Instead what I had in mind is a mesh that extends the full width of the case, such as LL has on the PC-Q19.While the Lian-Li twist friction-mounted fan filters seemed like a viable idea with Ncase M1 due to more flexibility, it did prove to be difficult in use (removing them) and many opted for the easily removeable Demciflex filters.
Would the Lian-Li filters still have any reason to be included in this case ?
Previously I thought to use small tabs at each end of the mesh that are inserted into slots in the chassis (you can actually see these in the internal pics). However, LL is using a magnetic attachment method on the PC-Q19, so that may be a possible alternative.That looks like a good solution. How would these be attached and removed ?
No. Instead what I had in mind is a mesh that extends the full width of the case, such as LL has on the PC-Q19.
You're right, but there is an argument to be made for at least the GPU side being filtered: with a blower card, there won't be much exhaust coming out the top and the GPU chamber may be slightly negative pressure, which will draw in dust. Also that side is on top, and a filter would catch stuff falling into the vents.Those shouldn't be filtered as they are supposed to be exhausts.
You're right, but there is an argument to be made for at least the GPU side being filtered: with a blower card, there won't be much exhaust coming out the top and the GPU chamber may be slightly negative pressure, which will draw in dust. Also that side is on top, and a filter would catch stuff falling into the vents.