Ruoh
Supreme [H]ardness
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2009
- Messages
- 5,857
WTF reason did they need to file a warrant? Send the guy a "ticket" in the mail. Hell, that's an infraction at worst.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That isn't how public funds work.
You can't walk in to a police station and steal a taser just because it's "taxpayer funded".
That isn't how public funds work.
You can't walk in to a police station and steal a taser just because it's "taxpayer funded".
It looks like he was warned by the same cop a few days back not to do that without permission:
But I'm still falling back on something else I said earlier. Electric cars are rated for quite a lot of travel between charges. Why couldn't he just wait until he got home?
Well, that pretty much seals the deal for me. He was warned, yet he did it anyway. He didn't ask permission even after being told that he needed to. That's his bad. Over a nickle. The electric car owner is wasting people's time, not the cop.
You throw a banana peel on the ground and a cop says it's littering and you can't do that. You do it again, and say that since the banana is biodegradable, it's not really littering.... Then, the cop gives you a ticket and you get mad? Cop told you what the law was. You disagree and do it anyway? I hope the cop does something. Otherwise, what good is the law if it's not enforced?
Car owner was a douche.
not quite as the water is understand as public due to drinking fountains. Maybe it would be closer to him filling up a gallon or two of water. Basically looking for something outside the accepted norm.Poor analogies, always poor analogies. It's MUCH more like he got himself a cup of water without asking.
not quite as the water is understand as public due to drinking fountains. Maybe it would be closer to him filling up a gallon or two of water. Basically looking for something outside the accepted norm.
It looks like he was warned by the same cop a few days back not to do that without permission.
I didn't say anything about a drinking fountain.
Lack of common sense at it's finest. I guess anyone with 1/2 a brain, a heart beat can become a school or local police officer...
If it even makes it before a judge, I bet the charges will be dropped and the arresting officer will receive a stern warning for clogging up the legal system with petty charges. That's what happened to a local officer who issued over 30 speeding citations in a single day for <5 MPH over the posted speed limit in a highway zone. The judge literally dismissed each and every case and thoroughly embarrassed the officer in front of a crowd of defendants.
I was wondering why the cop didn't just give him a warning. This explains a lot.
Sgt. Ford says the officer should have arrested Kamooneh on the spot. But he didn't. Instead, the officer filed a police report. Then 11 days passed, and two deputies showed up at his house in Decatur.
look man, posts like yours are why we can't have nice things like combine police oppression, an eventual uprising, and a creepy briefcase-toting man's plans upset by rude alien life making strange guttural noises.
think about that.
Bored cop wastes everyone's time, news at 11.
Not really the same thing. It would be like walking into the park and walking out with a cup of water from the water fountain.Walk into a park and walk out with a bench. You'll be arrested for theft.
As someone else in this thread said, try using water as an example. Drink out of the fountain and see if you get arrested. It's there for our convenience, not for decoration. If the outlets were open, the guy probably had some right to use it, although charging cars are a little ostentatious. I'm sure it was meant for smaller things like charging phones or plugging in stereos for picnics in the park or an electric stove or something.
Zarathustra[H];1040437581 said:The assumption that just because an outlet isn't locked means that it is intended for public use, is a little bit of a leap don't you think? Especially since he had been warned not to.
The only reason you install a fountain, is so the public can drink from it. That is not the case for an electric outlet.
I have electric outlets on the front of my house. Should people be able to assume that they are for public use as well?
If indeed the guy was warned and then repeated the offense he brought it upon himself. If so, he should stfu and be grateful that he got a courtesy warning in the first place.
He hadn't been warned not to.
*sigh, this is how "facts" get changed all the time. Someone misreads a poorly written article, inserts a bias, runs with a completely new story. In a week, this story will be about racial tensions and hatecrimes.
Well, that pretty much seals the deal for me. He was warned, yet he did it anyway. He didn't ask permission even after being told that he needed to. That's his bad. Over a nickle. The electric car owner is wasting people's time, not the cop.
You throw a banana peel on the ground and a cop says it's littering and you can't do that. You do it again, and say that since the banana is biodegradable, it's not really littering.... Then, the cop gives you a ticket and you get mad? Cop told you what the law was. You disagree and do it anyway? I hope the cop does something. Otherwise, what good is the law if it's not enforced?
Car owner was a douche.
Yeah but in the same vein I wouldn't use your garden hose to get a drink too. There's a difference between having utilities that are "open" on your private property vs. having utilities on public land (although it's unsure how public this outlet was, was it in the schools parking lot next to a parking space? or was it on the side of a building where he pulled 50 feet of extension cord to jack into).Zarathustra[H];1040437581 said:The assumption that just because an outlet isn't locked means that it is intended for public use, is a little bit of a leap don't you think? Especially since he had been warned not to.
The only reason you install a fountain, is so the public can drink from it. That is not the case for an electric outlet.
I have electric outlets on the front of my house. Should people be able to assume that they are for public use as well?
So they opened his car door, and looked inside to find out who the car was owned to? Are cops allowed to even do that? I guess if the cop wanted to argue he could probably say that he was investigating the area in where a crime was being committed ... *shrug*He used the school's outlet on November 2nd, cop took down his name and address from mail he found in the unlocked car, and was arrested for it on the 13th.
I've yet to meet an electric or hybrid driver that isn't a douche. Seems to be a prerequisite to owning one.
Zarathustra[H];1040437642 said:Reread the article, and fair enough, he wasnt warned in advance.
Even so, it seems a stretch to me to assume that just because there is an electric outlet on a wall somewhere that it is intended for public use.
Lack of common sense at it's finest. I guess anyone with 1/2 a brain, a heart beat can become a school or local police officer...
If it even makes it before a judge, I bet the charges will be dropped and the arresting officer will receive a stern warning for clogging up the legal system with petty charges. That's what happened to a local officer who issued over 30 speeding citations in a single day for <5 MPH over the posted speed limit in a highway zone. The judge literally dismissed each and every case and thoroughly embarrassed the officer in front of a crowd of defendants.
Either way, it wastes more taxpayer money to pursue the issue via an arrest than it would just to tell the guy to knock it off and/or lock up the outlet.
Reply With Quote
Walk into a park and drink from the water fountain. This cop will arrest you for theft.Walk into a park and walk out with a bench. You'll be arrested for theft.
Wow that's pretty sad. Probably a cop with an agenda for the oil industry so he's against electric cars. Too bad this guy's life is pretty much ruined now over something stupid like this. Knowing how the US looks at "theft" of non physical objects, he'll probably get like 10 years or something ridiculous like that. What would you call this, electron piracy?
He didn't steal $15 worth of physical product, he used five cents of an available utility. This is more akin to someone going to public property and washing dog poop off their shoes with a hose that was sitting outside.LeninGHOLA, So can I come take your mail box and sell it? I mean it's not worth prosecuting right, it'll cost more then the 15$ to just replace it. Maybe we can spread out the damage so it doesn't hurt just you and we will tax everyone for your mail box replacements.