71% Australians Do Not Look at Internet Porn

H

HardOCP News

[H] News
Joined
Dec 31, 1969
Messages
0
A new ABC Television survey says that 71% of Australians never look at internet porn. C'mon, really? They actually believed that? On a related note, the same survey proved that 29% of people in Australian are truthful when taking surveys.

We were also curious to know how many of you have actually been looking at naughty sites. When we asked “have you ever viewed material on the internet that would be Refused Classification”, 71% of you said “Never”, 24% said “Accidentally” and 6% said “On Purpose”. Men were more likely than women to have seen RC material (whether by accident or on purpose), and this likelihood decreased with age.
Click to expand...
 
yeah yeah, and only 40% of US male admit to looking at internet porn, so then you could
say 60% of US males don't look at it. not to mention only 6% of US females admit to
looking at internet porn , that would put the US numbers very close to this survey, that is if
you think these people are really being truthful.
 
Sungaisu said:
60% of the time, Surveys work 100% of the time.
Click to expand...

You're so wise. You're like a miniature Buddha, covered in hair.

The guys over get laid all the time because they use a cologne called Sex Panther by Odeon. It's illegal in nine countries... Yep, it's made with bits of real panther, so you know it's good.
 
Filthy Fernandez said:
You're so wise. You're like a miniature Buddha, covered in hair.

The guys over get laid all the time because they use a cologne called Sex Panther by Odeon. It's illegal in nine countries... Yep, it's made with bits of real panther, so you know it's good.
Click to expand...

I'm gonna be honest with you, that smells like pure gasoline.
 
whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, .........whoa.... where is my spiderman cup?










you totaly read that in peters voice...




also people need to not lie so much kthx
 
I don't think Refused Clasification means porn, do you really think Aussies are that prude?

From the article... yeah i know, reading is a bitch.

Survey participants were first read a definition of ‘Refused Classification’ as follows:

Images and information about one or more of the following:

- child sexual abuse
- bestiality
- sexual violence
- gratuitous, exploitative or offensive sexual fetishes; and
- detailed instructions on or promotion of crime, violence or use of illegal drugs
Click to expand...
 
original article said:
We were also curious to know how many of you have actually been looking at naughty sites. When we asked “have you ever viewed material on the internet that would be Refused Classification”, 71% of you said “Never”, 24% said “Accidentally” and 6% said “On Purpose”.
Click to expand...
Steve said:
On a related note, the same survey proved that 29% of people in Australian are truthful when taking surveys.
Click to expand...

Umm, only **6%** are telling the truth... 24 or the 29% claimed they "accidentally" reach them... yeah, right.

bomberboysk said:
71+24+6=101%? Why do i not trust this data.....
Click to expand...
Ever heard of something called "rounding errors". Anyways, the error bounds for the survey are definitely larger than any integer rounding errors could ever be. Anyways, the first rule of tech articles in the general press is:
DON'T OVERANALYZE THEIR INNACCURATE OVER SIMPLIFICATIONS
 
Hmmmm, yea right Australia. Or maybe they have mastered the art of finding a gf instead of fapping all day :p
 
Only cuz they censor everything there...if it wasn't for pristine beaches and wildlife...that place would be pretty lame.
 
bluebloggs said:
I don't think Refused Clasification means porn, do you really think Aussies are that prude?

From the article... yeah i know, reading is a bitch.
Click to expand...

Scroll down one paragraph:
And how many people have “ever viewed legal but sexually explicit material on the internet”? 26% said they had accidentally, 20% said they had on purpose and 60% said they had never.
Click to expand...
 
elite.mafia said:
BS story is BS
Click to expand...

I concur.
Majority of Australians would have no problems admitting to beer, sleeping on the job, women, soft drugs(with pride).
On the other hand the ABC is nothing more than the bitch of the Labor government, hence the bs numbers.
 
I was down-under working in perth, and there were porn mag's in the crapper!!!! All the dudes (btwn 18-50 yrs old) there did was talk about porn and women. Every conversation!

Either DVD sales are way up, or this survey was taken at an old-age home which doesn't have internet access. :rolleyes:

Dice
 
dice1111 said:
I was down-under working in perth, and there were porn mag's in the crapper!!!! All the dudes (btwn 18-50 yrs old) there did was talk about porn and women. Every conversation!

Either DVD sales are way up, or this survey was taken at an old-age home which doesn't have internet access. :rolleyes:

Dice
Click to expand...

I reiterate, who gets porn from a website? You have a higher risk of getting infected on those than having actual unprotected sex.
 
Bullsh!t
I was down-under working in perth, and there were porn mag's in the crapper!!!! All the dudes (btwn 18-50 yrs old) there did was talk about porn and women. Every conversation!
Click to expand...

I agree I also worked in Aussie land, in Perth and Exmouth and internet porn was quite high on the list of conversations and the guys even passed their cell phones around to see who had the best porn clips. Access to porn is also very easy, there is no filtering or censorship. The only shitty thing is their bandwidth throttling after seemingly small amounts of downloads, 4 to 8 gigs depending on provider,
 
sKiDmArK said:
So 71% if Australians do not have internet access.
Click to expand...

More like they don't have the bandwidth. My counsins live there and from the way they describe it, they don't even have the bandwidth to play online games.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top