21:9 larger than 3440x1440?

T

toncij

Weaksauce
Joined
Sep 30, 2012
Messages
69
Has anyone heard of a 21:9 screen coming that would use more than 34"?
 
Get a 40" or larger 4K display. Use GPU scaling to have it display 3840x1646.
 
evilsofa said:
Get a 40" or larger 4K display. Use GPU scaling to have it display 3840x1646.
Click to expand...

Kinda defeats the purpose of having a 21.9 screen.

I don't know of any 21.9 screen with a vertical resolution higher tan 1440.

I would be in for one were it to exist.
 
KazeoHin said:
Kinda defeats the purpose of having a 21.9 screen.

I don't know of any 21.9 screen with a vertical resolution higher tan 1440.

I would be in for one were it to exist.
Click to expand...

next jump is what 5120 x 2160? that's 11m pixel :D
 
This one is larger than 34"
LG-105UC9.jpg

but is a little bit pricey
 
I been keeping an eye out for a 21:9 larger than 34" but haven't seen or heard of any in the works yet. I'd love to have a 40"-45"" version. 4K is the next step up but my eyes are not good enough for that res and pc gaming. Those with 20/20 vision have some great things to look forward to in the large monitor segment.
 
Hmm, there really is no need for DP 1.3. Dell's 5K I have works very nice with two DP 1.2 cables, no issues.

Making a larger screen with larger screen res is not necessarily going to be 4K in terms of resolution by vert. You can make a 3740x1600 for example, or something else. Even in case of a 7K res like 6880x2880, you scale it, you don't use native, of course.

I find 34" too short/narrow and would love to see a larger screen that would match 30-32" screens in height and vertical resolution (being 1600 for example).
 
One thing went missing: the 21:9 in the 4K class should be curved. Telling this as an owner of 16:9 32"@4K, I can see the 21:9 so much stretched that curving would be a big plus.
 
I absolutely agree. 39-40" but 21:9 factor would be absolutely on my "must have" list. Just a touch more height than the 34" models but not so much as the 40" 16:9 models.

http://www.displaywars.com/40-inch-21x9-vs-34-inch-21x9

It would be entirely similar to a 4k 32" model when used in 16:9 mode which is good to me. That would basically be the same as turning a 32" model they currently make into one just a bit wider.

29" 21:9's were somewhat interesting
34" 21:9's have been big attention getters which shows where the users were going
40" 21:9's would be a hit I think - so many people wondering if they could get something bigger without making it as tall as a 40" 16:9

http://www.displaywars.com/40-inch-21x9-vs-40-inch-16x9

I honestly think that given 40" in either format (link above) people would prefer a tiny bit more width than the tiny bit more height. I'm just surprised that the OP said what has been running through my mind for months.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top