MFAA image quality, is it a crappy AA like TXAA or FXAA?

S

sblantipodi

2[H]4U
Joined
Aug 29, 2010
Messages
3,765
As title,
I'm bothered from nvidia throwing out only AA that decrease image quality by eliminating aliasing and blurring textures.

IMHO there is no improvement if you remove aliasing but you blurry the textures.
I prefer aliasing with sharp textures that an antialiased image with blurred textures.

Does MFAA blur textures like FXAA or TXAA?
I can't find an image comparison that compare MFAA to MSAA to see if texture is blurred or not.
 
No, MFAA is not nearly as blurry as FXAA.

Like stated in the [H] review, it's impossible to show from screenshots though... ;)
 
http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Graphi...Aliasing-MFAA-Tested-GTX-980/Image-Quality-Co

Pcperspective captures the outputs of videocards, (they can do things like frametimes, tearings, mfaa comparisons)

imo, Mfaa gets you about 75% of the way to msaa with about 50% of the performance hit. the game selection is very limited, and i think that it is single card only right now.

Static jaggies go away, 100% msaa at 50%msaa cost.
When moving, the 50%msaa jaggies can re appear, but are often hid by other factors, eye tracking, pixe response, etc.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top