![[H]ard|Forum](/styles/hardforum/xenforo/logo_dark.png){kind=logo}
Liberals never think they're liberal, just like the Westboro Baptists don't think they're extremists.
I forgot to mention, that even police officers are disarmed, and are given whistles, pepper spray, and batons only, and are afraid of policing certain areas except when in large groups which has further emboldened criminality. As of 2012, 37% of London residents were born outside the UK and 24% are non-UK nationals. If you're math challenged, that means that British people are a majority minority in London. A large portion do not primarily speak English, and there are 50 non-indigenous communities with a population of more than 10,000 in the city. 40% of all realestate in London is now foreign owned, with the number rising to 60% for the luxury home market. Sorry, I had mentioned that in my post and failed to back it up. Soooo... I'm wrong? How again? Name two other capitals where there are less nationals than foreigners... *insert jeopardy music*
That's o.k.. In America, the word conservative is usually misused to refer to people who are activists in destroying personal freedoms.
I forgot to mention, that even police officers are disarmed, and are given whistles, pepper spray, and batons only, and are afraid of policing certain areas except when in large groups which has further emboldened criminality. As of 2012, 37% of London residents were born outside the UK and 24% are non-UK nationals. If you're math challenged, that means that British people are a majority minority in London. A large portion do not primarily speak English, and there are 50 non-indigenous communities with a population of more than 10,000 in the city. 40% of all realestate in London is now foreign owned, with the number rising to 60% for the luxury home market. Sorry, I had mentioned that in my post and failed to back it up. Soooo... I'm wrong? How again? Name two other capitals where there are less nationals than foreigners... *insert jeopardy music*
The thinking from side of the political isle your are trying to defend is responsible for that definition of the term. Having used it originally to cloak themselves as something positive. Making a positive term a negative eventually once it became clear what they represented.
Please prove my statements are wrong, and help unfog that lens with the microfiber of liberalism.
Or just stick with "nuh uhhhh" with a head wobble and finger snap if you prefer.Yup. It's been said by many people, but our two-party political cartel maintains the status quo almost entirely by making sure at least half of the people are yelling and pointing fingers at the other half. Meanwhile, dictionary definitions of the words liberal and conservative reveal the exact same political ideology expressed in two slightly different ways.
Getting pretty bad here too, slowly but surely with our own forms of thoughtpolice, and our Libertarian party isn't able to break the winner-takes-all two party system at least at highest levels. I just wish people would learn to develop a thicker skin and just say "hey I think you're an A-hole" and leave it at that.
And again, just put that in perspective of all the real criminality problems they are suffering from, the "war of words" is what of course takes priority.
The sad part is that the United Kingdom was not that long ago one of the most envied and respected technologically advanced superpowers on the planet, by a long shot, but its all gone downhill with the shift in leadership and ideology.
The ironic part, is that they held back a German invasion so gallantly, when all Hitler really had to do instead was send boats and boats of illegal German immigrants to the UK to set up shop. Then, once they are 30%+ of the population, and their children all voters, they could simply influence politics in the interests of the Third Reich and be integrated that way. Pacifist invasion is the trick to take over a country without a shot fired!
Please prove my statements are wrong, and help unfog that lens with the microfiber of liberalism.
Cmon meow, their per capita GDP $6K. That's po' as fug. And ironically, even though they are a socialist state, they spend less on welfare than the UK as a percent of their GDP. And in some cases its really low, for example if villagers move to the cities for manufacturing jobs, they lose their free public schooling and have to send their kids to private school, primarily due to a huge bureaucracy.