DXDiag for Vista-SP1, doesn't show 10.1

;) *giggles*... you need DX10.1 capable hardware..... *giggles*

cmon please.. you both have 7+ years here....
 
Check System32 (and SysWOW64 if you have the x64 version) for these two files:

1/18/2008 11:34 PM 159,744 d3d10_1.dll
1/18/2008 11:34 PM 208,896 d3d10_1core.dll

Yeah? You have DX10.1. Now just wait a long time for anything useful to support the hardware. :p
 
pxc said:
1/18/2008 11:34 PM 159,744 d3d10_1.dll
1/18/2008 11:34 PM 208,896 d3d10_1core.dll
Click to expand...

I have these two files in my SysWOW64 folder.. but i'm not running DX10.1

I don't have the hardware :D
 
gaspah said:
;) *giggles*... you need DX10.1 capable hardware..... *giggles*

cmon please.. you both have 7+ years here....
Click to expand...
Hardware has nothing to do with what version is installed.

Bringing membership time into an argument... that's about as lame as the kids who brought post count into discussions. Kyle eliminated that stat from the side of posts for a reason... Another member with a poor attitude for my ignore list ;)
 
pxc said:
Check System32 (and SysWOW64 if you have the x64 version) for these two files:

1/18/2008 11:34 PM 159,744 d3d10_1.dll
1/18/2008 11:34 PM 208,896 d3d10_1core.dll

Yeah? You have DX10.1. Now just wait a long time for anything useful to support the hardware. :p
Click to expand...
Thanks!

Hrmmm... uhh I don't think that'll ever be an issue, .1 is such a minor incremental stepping. Just a small discrepancy I noticed and was curious about.
 
Menelmarar said:
Hardware has nothing to do with what version is installed. But thank you for making example of how noob you are ;)

Bringing membership time into an argument... that's about as lame as the kids who brought post count into discussions. Kyle eliminated that stat from the side of posts for a reason... Another member with a poor attitude for my ignore list ;)
Click to expand...

la la la attitude? la la la... i giggle and that's attitude??? what and that whole rant isn't?

why would dxdiag show that you're running a version of DirectX that you are not capable of running?? DirectX 10 wont install on a DirectX 9 capable video card... just quickly explain why you think that DirectX would report version 10.1 when your hardware is not 10.1

Menelmarar said:
Hardware has nothing to do with what version is installed.
Click to expand...
 
gaspah said:
DirectX 10 wont install on a DirectX 9 capable video card... just quickly explain why you think that DirectX would report version 10.1 when your hardware is not 10.1
Click to expand...

Yes, it will. I don't have a DX10 card but I certainly have DX10 installed. And dxdiag reports DX10 as well.
 
Menelmarar said:
Bringing membership time into an argument... that's about as lame as the kids who brought post count into discussions. Kyle eliminated that stat from the side of posts for a reason... Another member with a poor attitude for my ignore list ;)
Click to expand...

Not really.

Time = experience
Posts = bordem

An egg, suck it.
 
gaspah said:
;) *giggles*... you need DX10.1 capable hardware..... *giggles*

cmon please.. you both have 7+ years here....
Click to expand...

gaspah said:
la la la attitude? la la la... i giggle and that's attitude??? what and that whole rant isn't?

why would dxdiag show that you're running a version of DirectX that you are not capable of running?? DirectX 10 wont install on a DirectX 9 capable video card... just quickly explain why you think that DirectX would report version 10.1 when your hardware is not 10.1
Click to expand...
wow you sure act like an ass especially for someone that doesnt even know what they are talking about. the version of DX that shows up DXdiag has nothing to do with what hardware you actually have. the DX version that shows up is software. :rolleyes:
 
gaspah said:
DirectX 10 wont install on a DirectX 9 capable video card... just quickly explain why you think that DirectX would report version 10.1 when your hardware is not 10.1
Click to expand...


Nonsense, you can install Vista on a computer with integrated graphics with no problem at all...and DXDIAG will report DX10 installed
 
Menelmarar is correct. It does not matter what your hardware is. Bellow is the infomation on my pc with a nvidia 7600GT,

System Information
------------------
Time of this report: 3/23/2008, 14:23:28
Machine name: STEVE-PC
Operating System: Windows Vista™ Home Premium (6.0, Build 6001) Service Pack 1 (6001.longhorn_rtm.080118-1840)
Language: English (Regional Setting: English)
System Manufacturer: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd.
System Model: 965P-DS3
BIOS: Award Modular BIOS v6.00PG
Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6400 @ 2.13GHz (2 CPUs), ~2.8GHz
Memory: 4094MB RAM
Page File: 1983MB used, 6437MB available
Windows Dir: C:\Windows
DirectX Version: DirectX 10
DX Setup Parameters: Not found
DxDiag Version: 6.00.6001.18000 64bit Unicode

------------
DxDiag Notes
------------
Display Tab 1: No problems found.
Sound Tab 1: No problems found.
Sound Tab 2: No problems found.
Input Tab: No problems found.

--------------------
DirectX Debug Levels
--------------------
Direct3D: 0/4 (retail)
DirectDraw: 0/4 (retail)
DirectInput: 0/5 (retail)
DirectMusic: 0/5 (retail)
DirectPlay: 0/9 (retail)
DirectSound: 0/5 (retail)
DirectShow: 0/6 (retail)

---------------
Display Devices
---------------
Card name: NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GT
Manufacturer: NVIDIA
Chip type: GeForce 7600 GT
DAC type: Integrated RAMDAC
Device Key: Enum\PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_0391&SUBSYS_C6153842&REV_A1
Display Memory: 2040 MB
Dedicated Memory: 248 MB
Shared Memory: 1791 MB
Current Mode: 1680 x 1050 (32 bit) (59Hz)
Monitor: Generic Non-PnP Monitor
Driver Name: nvd3dum,nvd3dumx.dll,nvwgf2um,nvwgf2umx.dll
Driver Version: 7.15.0011.6925 (English)
DDI Version: 10
Driver Attributes: Final Retail
Driver Date/Size: 12/11/2007 18:06:00, 5263360 bytes
WHQL Logo'd: n/a
 
Maybe they're leaving the numbering scheme at 10 until there are significant changes to the code. Wasn't DX10.1 supposed to be a very small upgrade?
 
I am not saying that I expected to say 10.1, that it will say DX10, that that I show that as well.
 
dark_reign said:
Maybe they're leaving the numbering scheme at 10 until there are significant changes to the code. Wasn't DX10.1 supposed to be a very small upgrade?
Click to expand...
Correct. Small change. That's why I said in my opening post it was not a concern, just a curiosity at the discrepancy when everything I read said 10.1 came with SP1.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top