[H]ard|Forum

Go Back   [H]ard|Forum > [H]ard|Ware > Data Storage Systems

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 01-02-2007, 08:01 PM
grenadier Limp Gawd, 7.6 Years
 
grenadier is offline
1.5TB RAID5 Highpoint RocketRAID 2322

I'm currently running a Highpoint 2322 external RAID card with an Addonics Mini Storage Tower and 4 500GB Western Digital RE2 hard drives. With all four drives in RAID0 mode I'm getting ~250MB/s bursts, ~170MB/s average read, and ~125MB/s writes. In RAID5 I'm getting similar bursts, but average reads drop to ~70MB/s and write speed drops down to ~50MB/s.

Do these RAID0 speeds look good?

Is such a huge performance hit when going from RAID0 to RAID5 normal?

Here's my hdtach results compared - RAID0 is red and RAID5 is blue.

__________________
i5 750 w/stock hsf @ 3.6 - ASUS P7P55D Pro - 4GB G.Skill 1600 C9 - XFX 8800GT - Corsair TX750W - 3x WD 640GB blue - Antec P180B - 4x Scythe S-Flex 120mm fans - 2x Soyo 24" flat panels
  #2  
Old 01-02-2007, 08:18 PM
Nacho Limp Gawd, 3.9 Years
 
Nacho is offline
I myself use a rocket raid 2320 (internet card of I'm assuming the same chipset/such) and running raid 5, I'm getting "similar" results with 8x250 raid 5, so yes.. there is a performance difference between 0/5. It looks to me as if the rocketraid 232x cards do suffer from a lack of high-speed raid 5.

(Though, never tried 0 out on my card, I don't have a place to put 1.2TB of files if I rebuilt the array, plus I don't want to have a chance to loose data)
  #3  
Old 01-03-2007, 01:28 AM
grenadier Limp Gawd, 7.6 Years
 
grenadier is offline
I do believe that the 2320 is the same chipset.

Any chance you could post an image of the hdtach long bench scores for your array?
__________________
i5 750 w/stock hsf @ 3.6 - ASUS P7P55D Pro - 4GB G.Skill 1600 C9 - XFX 8800GT - Corsair TX750W - 3x WD 640GB blue - Antec P180B - 4x Scythe S-Flex 120mm fans - 2x Soyo 24" flat panels
  #4  
Old 01-03-2007, 01:54 AM
Tweak Monkey [H]Lite, 5.4 Years
 
Tweak Monkey is offline
You might want to try different sized blocks and run a few tests. I'm sure you can get better performance by using something other than the default size.
__________________
Abit IC7
P4HT 3.0 @ 3.6
2 x Kingston HyperX PC4000
2 x Maxtor 120GB SATA in RAID 0
80 GB Western Digital (music)
100 GB Western Digital (movies)
BFG GeForce 6800 GT

Macbook
2Ghz Core Duo
1Gb DDR2

Old name wasn't "active" enough....TweakGuy (since 2000) got the axe.
  #5  
Old 01-03-2007, 05:33 AM
Nacho Limp Gawd, 3.9 Years
 
Nacho is offline


Red is 32mb test, blue is 8mb test. Basically the same between the two.

The deciding factor may be the fact my array is 3/4 full. (this is also why it isnt 2 arrays of 4 drive raid 0, cant find a place to hold 1.2TB of data)

Last edited by Nacho; 01-03-2007 at 05:38 AM..
  #6  
Old 01-03-2007, 09:51 AM
grenadier Limp Gawd, 7.6 Years
 
grenadier is offline
I've tried both 64 and 1024k sized chunks and the performance difference is extremely small.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tweak Monkey
You might want to try different sized blocks and run a few tests. I'm sure you can get better performance by using something other than the default size.
__________________
i5 750 w/stock hsf @ 3.6 - ASUS P7P55D Pro - 4GB G.Skill 1600 C9 - XFX 8800GT - Corsair TX750W - 3x WD 640GB blue - Antec P180B - 4x Scythe S-Flex 120mm fans - 2x Soyo 24" flat panels
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:23 PM.


Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional

Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2000 - 2009 KB Networks, Inc.