![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
iPhone 4.0, Multi-Tasking This Summer
I've been using the Android platform and while sometimes I think I might like an iPhone then "new" features are announced and I come to my senses.
Quote:
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Still no word on Safari getting Flash 10.1?
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Never going to happen
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
About fucking time. Woot I'll probably get to work on an iPhone app soon
Woot.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
I hope not! Pages would bog the hell down.
If they implement Flash support, I hope it's set up so that app developers can make apps with Flash support. A Hulu app for example would be awesome.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
I absolutely LOATHE Apple and I LOATHE the fact that my girlfriend thinks so highly of Apple products.
I mean come on, I may just be stating the obvious here but I wouldn't be surprised if multitasking is the only real noticeable difference (aside from cosmetic), which essentially means your continuing the trend of paying for new features just to keep the device current with what other devices can do. What did the current update do that is actually noticeable? Add copy and paste and landscape keyboard and a few other fixes for a price. I am very grateful to Research In Motion (and any other phone maker) that release OS updates for free. However, I do fear that other manufacturers will start using Apple's business practices as it seems to be successful.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
If they release the update for free, good on them.
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wasnt the 3.0 update a paid update? Not a lot of money...$20-30 or something, but you had to pay for it nonetheless.
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
In a perfect world, this would be more ideal as multiple apps running in the background would eat up some battery life. But since this isn't going to happen, multitasking would be the next best thing. Unless I'm missing something that multitaskers would need? Music can already be multitasked, and browser position can already be saved.
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Than I must apologize for my hate as I didn't know enough. The only experience I have is with the iPod Touch... And you had to pay to upgrade to OS 3.0 (which added copy and paste). I was under the impression that it was the same for iPhone owners since they share the same OS.
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
So, the iPhone is getting a "feature" that every operating system since the 1960's, as well as every other smartphone OS has... good job getting with the times Apple....
I'll stick with Android thanks. But tht fanbois will eat it up like it's the next big thing ![]() Posted via [H] Mobile Device
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I own an iPhone and love it, its a good phone that people just like to hate on.
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sorry, I forgo, MS-DOS didn't support multitasking. Yay, they one-upped MS on something. Oh, wait...
Posted via [H] Mobile Device
|
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ok...I wasn't sure. I don't have a problem with the iPhone. My friends have them, but I've always been with Verizon (better coverage where I live and my family all has Verizon). I'd like to see a higher res screen like the nexus one and Droid on the next gen though.
|
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Azhar, I totally agree with you about the lack of coding from developers. This is where I get annoyed. If I need to check the time or battery level, I have to quit the app/game and lose my spot, check it and then reopen the app/game.
|
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
On a desktop or laptop, the lack of multitasking would be intolerable. On a phone, for me at least, it's totally forgivable. Not being able to multitask apps is really an occasional annoyance at best.
|
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
I cant wait to see how SJ spins this new feature. lol
|
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Once again it takes apple more then a year for users to have multi task! ahm..copy paste!
sorry apple but android is the way of future! And with CyanogenMod on nexus one the phone transforms to real super phone LINK
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|