[H]ard|Forum  

Go Back   [H]ard|Forum > [H]ard|Ware > Video Cards > nVidia Flavor

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #141  
Old 01-11-2010, 11:54 PM
Mr. Pedantic [H]ard|Gawd, 12 Months
 
Mr. Pedantic is offline
Quote:
I too am an ex-nvidia engineer and I say Fermi will be the best card ever.
"I am an ex-NVidia engineer and so is my wife!"

Sorry, couldn't resist...
  #142  
Old 01-16-2010, 01:38 AM
eric66 Gawd, 3.0 Years
 
eric66 is offline
Fermi Far cry 2 benchmark

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-0iF...layer_embedded
  #143  
Old 01-16-2010, 01:44 AM
SixtyWattMan 2[H]4U, 2.1 Years
 
SixtyWattMan is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by eric66 View Post
riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight...
__________________
| AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (Xigmatek S1283) | Gigabyte GA-890FXA-UD5 | Patriot 2x2GB DDR3 1600 | WD WD1001FALS | ASUS HD5850 900/1200 | X-FI Fatality | Seasonic X650 |
| Audio Technica ATH-AD700 | LianLi PC-A05NB | Dell U2410 + Vizio VO32LF + Shitty 17" Dell | Logitech G9 + G15 | Steelseries QCK Heavy | Windows 7 Ultimate 64 |
  #144  
Old 01-16-2010, 02:18 AM
shansoft 2[H]4U, 1.9 Years
 
shansoft is online now
Quote:
Originally Posted by eric66 View Post
huh, seems to be legit but still... it seems the performance to be about exactly the same as 5870, since my FPS is a bit lower than his while this game is heavily nVidia flavor..

does this mean anything when something is still not confirm

and why would they use Far Cry 2 as a benchmark instead of Batman
__________________
ASUS P6X58D Premium / Core i7 920 @ 4.2Ghz HT/ GSkill DDR3 1600 2x3GB / Western Digital RE3 500G / EVGA GTX 480 SSC @ Core 860Mhz / Memory 2000Mhz
  #145  
Old 01-16-2010, 05:51 AM
Niceone Gawd, 2.7 Years
 
Niceone is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by shansoft View Post
huh, seems to be legit but still... it seems the performance to be about exactly the same as 5870, since my FPS is a bit lower than his while this game is heavily nVidia flavor..

does this mean anything when something is still not confirm

and why would they use Far Cry 2 as a benchmark instead of Batman
Wouldn't be big suprise; GF100 was expected to have performance between HD5850 and HD5870
  #146  
Old 01-16-2010, 11:20 AM
RamonGTP 2[H]4U, 4.8 Years
 
RamonGTP is offline
I don't get it. How do we even know that's a GF100 benchmark?
__________________
Intel C2Q Q6600 @ 3.2GHz
Gigabyte EP35-DS3R
4x2GB DDR2 800
Radeon HD 5870 1GB
1x150GB Raptor|1x160GB|2x650GB|1x1TB
2xDVDRW|1xBRDVD
Corsair TX750
  #147  
Old 01-16-2010, 11:28 AM
Crosshairs Super Moderator, 6.6 Years
 
Crosshairs is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by RamonGTP View Post
I don't get it. How do we even know that's a GF100 benchmark?
We don't know....but the numbers look nice........whatever it is, I want one...
  #148  
Old 01-16-2010, 01:25 PM
shansoft 2[H]4U, 1.9 Years
 
shansoft is online now
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crosshairs View Post
We don't know....but the numbers look nice........whatever it is, I want one...
the number looks alright to me, doesn't necessary look nice when it seems to perform just a bit better than 5870 in terms of fps when Far Cry 2 is nVidia flavor...
__________________
ASUS P6X58D Premium / Core i7 920 @ 4.2Ghz HT/ GSkill DDR3 1600 2x3GB / Western Digital RE3 500G / EVGA GTX 480 SSC @ Core 860Mhz / Memory 2000Mhz
  #149  
Old 01-16-2010, 01:58 PM
Einhanderkiller 2[H]4U, 4.1 Years
 
Einhanderkiller is offline
GF100 One Card Ray Tracing
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XFgzG9WyGNQ

GF100 Three Card Ray Tracing
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cbnv_z6VDj8&fmt=18

GF100 Water Tessellation
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QLu8DyzoVMs

GF100 Hair Demo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uEieu-OKVvs&fmt=22

Far Cry 2 Benchmark
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcXmV5Je_gc
__________________
Intel Core i7 930 @ 3.5 GHz /// Gigabyte ATI Radeon HD 5870 (Catalyst 10.8)
Corsair Dominator 6GB (3x2GB) DDR3-1600 RAM /// ASUS P6X58D-E Motherboard
Thermolab Baram CPU Cooler /// Corsair 700D Chassis /// Corsair HX750W PSU
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB /// Creative X-Fi XtremeMusic
Windows 7 x64
  #150  
Old 01-16-2010, 02:53 PM
dR.Jester [H]ard|Gawd, 6.3 Years
 
dR.Jester is offline
I heard nVidia got pretty angry when these videos leaked.
__________________
EVGA X-58 :: Intel Core 2 i7 920 @ 3.8Ghz :: 6GB Corsair Dominator :: XFX 5870 @ 1Ghz :: HDDs 4.45TB :: X-Fi Fagtality :: Corsair 850 :: Dell 2407 :: Windows 7 :: Logitech G15 and G9

Heatware - http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=41271
  #151  
Old 01-16-2010, 03:24 PM
Cyrilix 2[H]4U, 5.6 Years
 
Cyrilix is online now
Quote:
Originally Posted by dR.Jester View Post
I heard nVidia got pretty angry when these videos leaked.
Marketing always gets angry when information doesn't circulate through the exact channels that they specify and in the exact way that they want the information to be distributed.
__________________
Intel Core i7 920 --- eVGA 8800 GTX --- 12GB G.Skill PC12800 --- Intel X25-M 80GB --- Corsair HX-620
Digital Out >> CIAudio VDA-2 >> MisterX M³ with STEPS (OPA627/637) >> Beyerdynamic DT880 / Audio-Technica A900 LTD
Digital Out >> CIAudio VDA-2 >> Panasonic SA-XR55 >> Onix X-LS Encore / Onix X-Sub
  #152  
Old 01-16-2010, 03:51 PM
chklin Limp Gawd, 2.4 Years
 
chklin is offline
Of course nVidia is angry. If the leak was unintentional, they must be angry about the leak. If the leak was intentional, they have to say that they are angry about the leak to lend credibility to the leaked information. If the videos were faked instead of leaked, they would be angry about somebody faking the video. If nVidia faked and then leaked the videos, they still have to put up an appearance.

Regardless of what really happened, they will tell you that they are angry.
  #153  
Old 01-16-2010, 05:37 PM
Hypernova [H]ard|Gawd, 3.6 Years
 
Hypernova is offline
Angry or not NV can use some good publicity right now and IMO this is one of them. I wonder what the Caustic guys are thinking right now.
__________________
"Some of you whiny guys are the biggest bunch of pussies I have ever seen." --Kyle Bennett
  #154  
Old 01-16-2010, 05:44 PM
MiG31_Foxhound Limp Gawd, 2.2 Years
 
MiG31_Foxhound is offline
Hair and raytracing demos are impressive. Current games can't really be expected to take full advantage of the hardware in the way it was intended. I wonder if this hardware will necessitate an expansion of the TWIMTBP program in order to see significant gains on the 5xxx's.
__________________
Intel QX9650 @ 3.6ghz w/ Zalman CNPS9500
EVGA 790i Ultra SLI
2x BFG GTX280OC
2gb Corsair DDR3 1333 (PC10600)
Thermaltake Toughpower W0133RU 1200W PSU
WD Raptor X WD1500AHFD 150gb
  #155  
Old 01-16-2010, 06:42 PM
XMAN245 Limp Gawd, 4.3 Years
 
XMAN245 is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by Niceone View Post
Wouldn't be big suprise; GF100 was expected to have performance between HD5850 and HD5870
expected accoridn got who? Charlie? That man will be eating massive crow for his "performance" predictions concerning Fermi when it launches. And teh card in the video was the GTX360 with 448SPs.
  #156  
Old 01-16-2010, 08:43 PM
Cyrilix 2[H]4U, 5.6 Years
 
Cyrilix is online now
The lower end version of this card better be 180W or less.
__________________
Intel Core i7 920 --- eVGA 8800 GTX --- 12GB G.Skill PC12800 --- Intel X25-M 80GB --- Corsair HX-620
Digital Out >> CIAudio VDA-2 >> MisterX M³ with STEPS (OPA627/637) >> Beyerdynamic DT880 / Audio-Technica A900 LTD
Digital Out >> CIAudio VDA-2 >> Panasonic SA-XR55 >> Onix X-LS Encore / Onix X-Sub
  #157  
Old 01-16-2010, 09:18 PM
XMAN245 Limp Gawd, 4.3 Years
 
XMAN245 is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyrilix View Post
The lower end version of this card better be 180W or less.
Why?
  #158  
Old 01-16-2010, 09:18 PM
Kowan [H]ardness Supreme, 10.2 Years
 
Kowan is offline
They could always lower the 2D clocks to enough so it's not stable in 2D...
__________________
EVGA X58 SLI | i7 920 / ThermalRight Ultra-120 Extreme | 6GB(3x2) Corsair Dominator 1600 DDR3 | EVGA's GTX285 TRI-SLI
2 WD VelociRaptor 300GB/WD Caviar Black 1TB | 8 Channel High Definition | Logitech Z-5500
Antec 1200 | Thermaltake W0133RU 1200w | Dell 3008WFP/2407WFP | Logitech G15/G5 | Vista 64bit Ultimate | APC BACK-UPS RS 1500VA LCD
PS3 Phat and Slim | Black and Red XBOX360 Elites
  #159  
Old 01-16-2010, 10:15 PM
Yikes2000 Limp Gawd, 3.2 Years
 
Yikes2000 is online now
Quote:
Originally Posted by XMAN245 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyrilix View Post
The lower end version of this card better be 180W or less.
Why?
To compete with ATI 58xx / 57xx.
  #160  
Old 01-16-2010, 10:32 PM
XMAN245 Limp Gawd, 4.3 Years
 
XMAN245 is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yikes2000 View Post
To compete with ATI 58xx / 57xx.
If your looking for that, go ahead and buy a 58xx card then. Fermi is going to be 225W+ power draw 448 and 512SP versions. And the 448SP is already showing to be faster than the 5870 so I can't wait to see what the 512SP part does specially concidering it supposed to have higher clock than the 448SP part.
Closed Thread


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:45 AM.


Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2000 - 2010 KB Networks, Inc.