Recent content by ravensteel

So are they going to leave out in the movie where Zoe Quinn cheated on her boyfriend 5 times... yes.. no...maybe.. then year later takes him to court for a restraining order, but loses that fight..Anyway.. I do keep up with Gamergate when I can, there's some nice and decent people within that...

Saddens me they went with Nvidia, however it's good they kept it mostly neutral... I want most games to be that way... It's okay to use tools (Gameworks) to help with game development, just not right to have an unfair advantage with it...

I just don't even care, if Star Citizen fails, it's on CIG to either fix it or seek help from a AAA publisher to finance it. I doubt this game will just stop development entirely, pack up, call it quits.. It's way.. too popular to do that... I'm sure a major AAA game studio would have interest...

yeah 990 is a possibility since AMD coming out with the dual Fury X soon and it might be both cards as you said.. When I thought about it, them flying people out to see it, it has to be a big deal so I'm leaning more toward the dual GPU 990.. Nvidia going to have the same problem as AMD with...

I'm thinking the 960ti ... they have a price gap between the 960 and 970 so I'm thinking it's that, plus AMD is coming out in October with the 380XT so Nvidia gotta compete with it.

I recently got the Cryorig H5A and this air cooled cooler is amazing for the price..($46) I maxed out all my FX 8320 cores @stock and it stays between 50-52c mostly 51c so I'm very pleased with it.. I really can't see myself spending $200+ for this and get a slightly better cooling performance...

I think they really could of done the normal Fury, cut down the clock speed and sold it for $450-$500 and that might be more reasonable..AMD is not going to sell many of these Nano's at this price point. You have the Fury X thats clearly better in every way with higher clock speeds and water...

okay wait.. they are going too sell this for $650.. and it being just a reference card.. AMD what the hell you doing..I mean $600 maybe, but I was thinking like $500 for it.. I know this card isn't cheap too make, but who in their right mind is going to pay $650 for the Nano when you can get a...

C. Reliability

I'll eventually upgrade to Windows 10, right now I'm waiting it out more to see if problems come up from it. The reason I am upgrading isn't anything else besides DirectX12... Who knows what incompatibility issues will pop up or drivers..

Xfire doesn't work in that game yet, nor SLi.. plus the game was specifically made for Nvidia hardware...it's not AMD... the game is broken for AMD..

It's exactly what I thought was going to happen, take at least a month to fix at the earliest. b/c two months to port it isn't enough, so maybe October for a solid release.. I'm still interested in the game, but I'm certainly going to wait for a decent deal on it and it get patched up more after...

It was the 290x, not the 390x...with better performance than the 290x and a TDP of 175w thats quite amazing.. well for AMD it is..

Thats true, 4k is limited by the horsepower of the video card...(Fury) put two Fury's in and it does 4k no problem. The Fury has a huge ass memory bandwidth, like a huge pipe instead of sucking through a straw with GDDR5...DirectX12 may change this more, although current games are just written...

that's the cheapest, but most average $330-$350 and can go to $400 for the 290x.. Okay let's say you did buy the 290x for $300.. Why would you when a 390 is just $30 more, has 8gb of VRAM and performs the same or 5% better than the 290x..? IDK about you, but I'm willing to spend $30 more for...