Buford
01-03-2005, 04:15 PM
I have question I would like some help pondering.
I have 2 DVD-R drives on an ATA100 bus. (see system details below) I like to archive DVDs to disk using DVD Shrink.
Now nothing seems to be CPU limited in the process. I can put in one DVD and analyze & encode at ~ 5,600 KB/s. But if I put a DVD in each DVD drive and run two instances of DVD Shrink at a time each they run about the same total bandwidth and the process takes about twice as long, each process taking one virtual CPU at ~ 25% utilization at max priority.
This is only about 1/10 the bandwidth of the memory or raptor hard disk. What is halving the speed when I do two DVDs at a time? The old ATA100 CD/DVD interface?
If I was certain that was the bottleneck I might invest in a pair of SATA DVD burners.
Thanks
I have 2 DVD-R drives on an ATA100 bus. (see system details below) I like to archive DVDs to disk using DVD Shrink.
Now nothing seems to be CPU limited in the process. I can put in one DVD and analyze & encode at ~ 5,600 KB/s. But if I put a DVD in each DVD drive and run two instances of DVD Shrink at a time each they run about the same total bandwidth and the process takes about twice as long, each process taking one virtual CPU at ~ 25% utilization at max priority.
This is only about 1/10 the bandwidth of the memory or raptor hard disk. What is halving the speed when I do two DVDs at a time? The old ATA100 CD/DVD interface?
If I was certain that was the bottleneck I might invest in a pair of SATA DVD burners.
Thanks