PDA

View Full Version : External ESata Raid for Video Editing


schander
06-30-2009, 03:25 AM
Hi all,
I recently bought a hd video camcorder :) and now need to edit the footage. However I just don't think my laptops internal 5400rpm disk is up to the task :(. Brief laptop spec is T8100, 4gb ram and 256mg 8400gs (gfx card).
Realistically I know that should be doing the editing on a beefy Quad core but i don't want to spend 600+ on building a desktop.
I'm thinking that i can buy a 2port esata express card like:
http://www.play.com/PC/PCs/-/698/905/-/3471558/Sitecom-XC-041-2-Port-eSATA-Express-Card/Product.html?searchtype=genre

And buying an external 2 drive esata case:
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&item=390058655559
Do the figure look sensible for the speed in raid 0?

For the drives i was thinking about a pair of WD Caviar blacks (640gb 32mb cache) or should i be buying the WD RE3 (750gb 32mb cache) considering that I will be putting the drives in raid 0. I know that I'll be able to use the drive again when I can afford to build a desktop.:(

What do you folks think?

Thanks
Satpal

valve1138
06-30-2009, 04:43 PM
Have you tried the internal drive?

And you don't need a RAID setup for consumer HD editing. One external drive would be fine.

schander
06-30-2009, 05:50 PM
Have you tried the internal drive?

And you don't need a RAID setup for consumer HD editing. One external drive would be fine.

I have tried the internal drive and the hd just goes mad and i get suttered playback, I think is this down to having the os and videos on the same drive.
I did a hd tune benchmark for my system drive (Hitachi 5400rpm 250gb) and the results were:
Transfer Rate Min 18.2 mb/s, Max 56.6MB/s, Avg 43.2MB/s
Access Time 17.6ms
Brust 67.3MB/s
CPU Usage -1.0%
The graph starts at ~55MB/s and tapers to down to ~27MB/s

I have a external usb drive (Segate 5400rpm 320GB) and the result were:
Transfer Rate Min 19.9 MB/s, Max 33.2MB/s, Avg 28.3MB/s
Access Time 18.4ms
Brust 21.4MB/s
CPU Usage -1.0%
The graph starts at ~25MB/s and is pretty flat with a few peaks (max 33MB/s)

Would you suggest that went with a esata external drive or stick with usb. Could i reuse my 2.5 seagate in and external closure or should I really be getting 7200rpm WD with a big cache?

I just tried playing the same clip in Sony Vegas, one form local hd and one form external usb. Both were jerky the one from the external more so.

Thanks
Satpal

Zepher
06-30-2009, 06:47 PM
what video format does your camera use? maybe it's the laptop causing the jerky playback.

Syntax Error
06-30-2009, 07:45 PM
Using USB would be an immediate bottleneck for you. eSATA would be preferable, but a lot of laptops don't have that. If you absolutely need the bandwidth of eSATA, an ExpressCard eSATA adapter may be an option.

schander
07-01-2009, 01:27 AM
@Zepher My camera is avchd it's a Canon and all my recording are full hd @ 17MB/s I can playback the files using PowerDVD/Windows Media Player fine.

@Syntax Error Yeah i though usb interface was a botle neck aswell. Although it should be given that the figure that i got 33MB/s = 264Mb/s and the USB 2 interface is 480Mb/s (60MB/s)

So this seems to be pointing me towards thinking that a desktop would possible be the best solution, however i just don't have the right now to build a desktop. I think I'll buy the estat expresscard alongwith an external(non raid) 3.5 hd (WD black) and esata case.

Thanks

Satpal

Syntax Error
07-01-2009, 12:06 PM
I have never gotten even near USB 2.0's theoretical 480Mbps, so don't count on it. A realistic estimate would be around 30 MB/s.