PDA

View Full Version : is this a good hard drive


sandman92
08-16-2008, 07:06 PM
is this a good hard drive

http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=2268595&sku=TSD-320AS

compslckr
08-16-2008, 07:09 PM
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822136218

thats about the best hard drive you could buy right now

Western Digial 6400AAKS

For $25 extra you get double the capacity and a known performer.

sandman92
08-16-2008, 07:12 PM
i dont think i need all that memory
right now i have a 200 gig hard drive for 3 years and only used 100 gigs so far

Danny Bui
08-16-2008, 07:33 PM
It's not memory, it's storage. RAM is memory, hard drives are storage.

Anyway, ditch that Seagate drive and go with this faster drive instead:
Western Digital WD3200AAKS 320GB 7200RPM SATA 3.0Gb/s Hard Drive (http://www.zipzoomfly.com/jsp/ProductDetail.jsp?ProductCode=10005615) - $62

It's almost as fast as the WD6400AAKS drive linked above.

brons2
08-16-2008, 07:37 PM
I vote for the Segate, based on a personal bias against WD products :D

sandman92
08-16-2008, 07:52 PM
is HITACHI a good brand

brons2
08-16-2008, 08:15 PM
I've had good luck with the IBM/Hitachi Deskstars, but others haven't been so lucky. At one point they came to be known as "Deathstars" due to a high failure rate.

Hitachi bought IBM's disk drive division 6 or 7 years ago, that's the reason I mention IBM...

Syntax Error
08-16-2008, 08:33 PM
I've had good luck with the IBM/Hitachi Deskstars, but others haven't been so lucky. At one point they came to be known as "Deathstars" due to a high failure rate.

Hitachi bought IBM's disk drive division 6 or 7 years ago, that's the reason I mention IBM...

The "Deathstars" were only one model, IIRC the 75GB GX DeskStars that were inherently badly manufactured in a certain lot. This reputation goes far, but as far as I know today, Hitachi drives are pretty good performers. Of course, they're a bit behind in platter technology as their 1TBs recently switched from five platters to three platters of greater areal density, but as with any hard disk manufacturer, your mileage may vary determinant on if you get an inherently bad DOA drive or whatever problems with any hard disk brand. Others swear by WD, Seagate, Samsung, Hitachi, etc and others shun them. It's a matter of experience, of course.

UrielDagda
08-17-2008, 01:24 AM
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822136218

thats about the best hard drive you could buy right now

Western Digial 6400AAKS

For $25 extra you get double the capacity and a known performer.

http://www.zipzoomfly.com/jsp/ProductDetail.jsp?ProductCode=10008688

I would say get it from ZipZoomFly.. They package their hard drives so they will actually be functional when you get them!

bigdogchris
08-17-2008, 05:33 AM
Sandman, you may never use the full 640GB of that drive, but I guarantee it's 2x the performance as that 320GB seagate you linked.

Danny Bui
08-17-2008, 05:46 AM
Sandman, you may never use the full 640GB of that drive, but I guarantee it's 2x the performance as that 320GB seagate you linked.

I wouldn't say twice the performance. The Seagate 7200.10 320GB has an average transfer speed of 65MB/s give or take while the Western Digital 640GB has an average transfer speed of 95MB/s give or take.

j3ff86
08-25-2008, 02:08 PM
How is the WD faster than the seagate? It has similar specs :confused:

Danny Bui
08-25-2008, 05:29 PM
How is the WD faster than the seagate? It has similar specs :confused:

Platter density, platter design, # of platters, efficiency, etc. All of that allows the WD 640GB drive to be faster than the Seagate 7200.10 320GB drive.