PDA

View Full Version : How much of a performance increase would I see going RAID 0?


blairellis
05-29-2007, 07:51 PM
Specs are in sig. Thinking about adding another of the exact same drive and setting up RAID 0.

How much faster/quicker will the system be? Noticable? Worth the 75 bucks spent on everything setting it up? (HD Cooler, Extra Long SATA Cable, HD itself, etc.)

EnderW
05-29-2007, 08:18 PM
interesting question, wonder if it's been asked before?

Ryom
05-29-2007, 10:27 PM
Search function would have given you about a million hits, but here is one to look over: http://tweakers.net/reviews/515

MixManSC
05-30-2007, 09:30 AM
interesting question, wonder if it's been asked before?

That made me laugh.... ;)

Order
05-30-2007, 12:49 PM
You won't see much of advantage with 2 drives in RAID 0. 4+ drives with a good controller with a lot of cache, however, is a different story.

protias
05-30-2007, 09:21 PM
The answer is yes, no, maybe.

drizzt81
05-30-2007, 11:15 PM
The answer is yes, no, maybe.

You are wrong. The answer is: it depends.

protias
05-30-2007, 11:32 PM
You are wrong. The answer is: it depends.

How is that really any different from my answer? :confused:

drizzt81
05-30-2007, 11:49 PM
How is that really any different from my answer? :confused:

This is a RAID-0 thread, there has to be a flamewar. Let me call you a name: Stephen! </end of threadcrap on my behalf>

michealo
05-31-2007, 07:44 AM
any increase in performance is negligible, and not truly worth the increased cost and risk of data loss.

blairellis
05-31-2007, 04:23 PM
any increase in performance is negligible, and not truly worth the increased cost and risk of data loss.
Thats what I was looking for. Thanks for the clear, concise, straight to the point, answer to my question ;)

FragMan
05-31-2007, 04:38 PM
I for one have experienced an improvement using raid 0, with 2 inexpensive WD SATA 80GB drives in RAID 0 - I get an average transfer rate of 102 mb/s, I have a single non raided RAPTOR drive in the same machine - my average tranfer rate is 76 mb/s, and a regular SATA 7200rpm drive usually benches around 55-60 mb/s.

my quick verdict- RAID is faster- just remember to back up - its more finiky

i had a thread for a question on HD tach- it shows some results
http://www.hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1196084

drizzt81
05-31-2007, 04:54 PM
I for one have experienced an improvement using raid 0, with 2 inexpensive WD SATA 80GB drives in RAID 0 - I get an average transfer rate of 102 mb/s, I have a single non raided RAPTOR drive in the same machine - my average tranfer rate is 76 mb/s, and a regular SATA 7200rpm drive usually benches around 55-60 mb/s.

my quick verdict- RAID is faster- just remember to back up - its more finiky

i had a thread for a question on HD tach- it shows some results
http://www.hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1196084

The real kicker is: Do you play HDTach average transfer rate all day?

FragMan
05-31-2007, 05:06 PM
The real kicker is: Do you play HDTach average transfer rate all day?

no i dont.
however, the question was, Is there a performance increase? the simplest irrevocable answer is : Yes

What we didnt delve into was, if the increase was applicable to the task at hand. that my friend is room for debate.

for me .. if you do video, make video ... then yes. if you game. er... then no. not reallly. if you dont do anything but surf the internet then ... no. not even if you had 4 raptors or cheetahs or barracuda drives.... no.

Lazn_Work
05-31-2007, 05:26 PM
.. if you do video, make video ... then yes. if you game. er... then no. not reallly. if you dont do anything but surf the internet then ... no. not even if you had 4 raptors or cheetahs or barracuda drives.... no.

There it is.. Media encoding, large file manipulation, extracting etc. then yes AID 0 is beneficial. Games etc, the normal load time performance increase is ~3% hardly worth it.

(RAID 0 is not RAID, it is AID 0 lol, not redundant at all)

So the answer is that it depends on what you use your computer for.

Dan_D
05-31-2007, 05:40 PM
There it is.. Media encoding, large file manipulation, extracting etc. then yes AID 0 is beneficial. Games etc, the normal load time performance increase is ~3% hardly worth it.

(RAID 0 is not RAID, it is AID 0 lol, not redundant at all)

So the answer is that it depends on what you use your computer for.

Quite true.

FragMan
05-31-2007, 06:16 PM
(RAID 0 is not RAID, it is AID 0 lol, not redundant at all)

So the answer is that it depends on what you use your computer for.

AID..heheh - ok ok . we should add that to BIOS setting lol :D